Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs ZoomInfo

Dead heat on metrics won: pick on the dimension you buy. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

ZoomInfo

Enterprise GTM intelligence: contacts, companies, technographics, intent, orchestration; GTM API with OAuth 2.0.

★ 4.5 · 9,460 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #11 of 29	ZoomInfo · #29 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	52.3%
Valid email rate	75.6%	-
Latency p50	3,302ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.0040	-
Invalid rate	0.0%	-
Catch-all share	24.4%	-
Business email	100.0%	-
Right-person rate	95.1%	-
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	-
Catch-all detection	100.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	+62.5 pts	-
Geographic coverage	10	-

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #17 of 24	ZoomInfo · #20 of 24
Match rate	46.9%	60.2%
Valid / reachable rate	82.6%	-
Latency p50	1,277ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.190	-
Right-person rate	89.5%	-
Mobile coverage	36.7%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	17.4%	-
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	91.3%	-
Geographic coverage	5	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #18 of 24	ZoomInfo · not measured
Profile match rate	13.3%	-
Identity accuracy	100.0%	-
Latency p50	3,326ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.0060	-
Current employer accuracy	50.0%	-
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	50.0%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	75.0%	-
Work history completeness	1.0	-
Education completeness	50.0%	-
Skills present	62.5%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	0.0%	-

Questions about Enrich.so vs ZoomInfo

Which is better, Enrich.so or ZoomInfo?

They win the same number of metrics, 1 each, on the 2 benchmarks that measured both: pick on the data you buy. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, ZoomInfo #29 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, ZoomInfo #20 of 24.

How do Enrich.so and ZoomInfo compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; ZoomInfo holds 4.5 / 5 across 9,460 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and ZoomInfo?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; ZoomInfo offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.