Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs QuickEnrich

Enrich.so wins 11 of 18 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #11 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	53.3%
Valid email rate	75.6%	53.1%
Latency p50	3,302ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.0040	$0.0075
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	24.4%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	95.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	+62.5 pts	-
Geographic coverage	10	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #17 of 24	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	46.9%	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	82.6%	75.0%
Latency p50	1,277ms	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.190	$0.0060
Right-person rate	89.5%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	36.7%	16.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	8.3%
Low-activity share	17.4%	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	-	91.7%
Country accuracy	91.3%	91.7%
Geographic coverage	5	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #18 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	13.3%	-
Identity accuracy	100.0%	-
Latency p50	3,326ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.0060	-
Current employer accuracy	50.0%	-
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	50.0%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	75.0%	-
Work history completeness	1.0	-
Education completeness	50.0%	-
Skills present	62.5%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	0.0%	-

Questions about Enrich.so vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Enrich.so or QuickEnrich?

Enrich.so wins 11 of the 18 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Enrich.so $0.190, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do Enrich.so and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and QuickEnrich?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.