Head-to-head · B2B data

Bright Data vs Enrich.so

Bright Data wins 6 of 10 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Bright Data live

Web-data infrastructure and company data feeds unifying 10+ sources, delivered to warehouses and files.

★ 4.7 · 413 reviewsA

Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Bright Data · not in suite	Enrich.so · #11 of 29
Match rate	-	68.3%
Valid email rate	-	75.6%
Latency p50	-	3,302ms
Cost / valid email	-	$0.0040
Invalid rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all share	-	24.4%
Business email	-	100.0%
Right-person rate	-	95.1%
Decoy hit rate	-	20.0%
Catch-all detection	-	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+62.5 pts
Geographic coverage	-	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Bright Data · not in suite	Enrich.so · #17 of 24
Match rate	-	46.9%
Valid / reachable rate	-	82.6%
Latency p50	-	1,277ms
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.190
Right-person rate	-	89.5%
Mobile coverage	-	36.7%
Disconnected rate	-	0.0%
Low-activity share	-	17.4%
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	-	91.3%
Geographic coverage	-	5

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Bright Data · #20 of 24	Enrich.so · #18 of 24
Profile match rate	89.8%	13.3%
Identity accuracy	97.7%	100.0%
Latency p50	12,746ms	3,326ms
Price / matched profile	$0.0013	$0.0060
Current employer accuracy	84.1%	50.0%
Move detection	76.9%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	0.0%	50.0%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	95.5%	75.0%
Work history completeness	-	1.0
Education completeness	68.2%	50.0%
Skills present	0.0%	62.5%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	57.1%	0.0%

Live Profile Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-26

Metric	Bright Data · #5 of 5	Enrich.so · not in suite
Current-job accuracy	79.2%	-
Fetch success	91.1%	-
Latency p50	9,230ms	-
Cost / profile	$0.0013	-
Move detection	84.6%	-
Still at previous employer	5.0%	-
Control accuracy	73.5%	-
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	68.5%	-

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Bright Data · #1 of 6	Enrich.so · not in suite
Employer coverage	98.3%	-
Postings recall	85.0%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / job	$0.0017	-
Closed or unknown postings	10.4%	-
Duplicate postings	15.0%	-
Location accuracy	95.5%	-
Posted-date accuracy	24.5%	-
Description present	100.0%	-
Coverage by country	92.9%	-

Questions about Bright Data vs Enrich.so

Which is better, Bright Data or Enrich.so?

Bright Data wins 6 of the 10 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Bright Data #20 of 24, Enrich.so #18 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Bright Data or Enrich.so?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: People Data, price per matched profile: Bright Data $0.0013, Enrich.so $0.0060.

How do Bright Data and Enrich.so compare in user reviews?

Bright Data holds 4.7 / 5 across 413 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt; Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Bright Data and Enrich.so?

Bright Data offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.