Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs Forager

Forager wins 14 of 24 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #11 of 29	Forager · #28 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	4.1%
Valid email rate	75.6%	50.0%
Latency p50	3,302ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.0040	$0.190
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	24.4%	50.0%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	95.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	-
Catch-all detection	100.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	+62.5 pts	-
Geographic coverage	10	1

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #17 of 24	Forager · #19 of 24
Match rate	46.9%	42.9%
Valid / reachable rate	82.6%	90.5%
Latency p50	1,277ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.190	$0.316
Right-person rate	89.5%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	36.7%	38.8%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	17.4%	9.5%
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	91.3%	90.5%
Geographic coverage	5	7

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #18 of 24	Forager · #8 of 24
Profile match rate	13.3%	95.9%
Identity accuracy	100.0%	97.9%
Latency p50	3,326ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.0060	$0.020
Current employer accuracy	50.0%	91.5%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	50.0%	85.1%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	75.0%	95.7%
Work history completeness	1.0	8.6
Education completeness	50.0%	100.0%
Skills present	62.5%	91.5%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	0.0%	83.3%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · not in suite	Forager · #5 of 10
Coverage	-	95.0%
Detection accuracy	-	63.5%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / lookup	-	$0.020
Live stack recall	-	44.0%
Technologies per domain	-	64
Dated results	-	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	-	85.0%

Questions about Enrich.so vs Forager

Which is better, Enrich.so or Forager?

Forager wins 14 of the 24 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, Forager #28 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, Forager #19 of 24; People Data: Enrich.so #18 of 24, Forager #8 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or Forager?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, Forager $0.190; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Enrich.so $0.190, Forager $0.316; People Data, price per matched profile: Enrich.so $0.0060, Forager $0.020.

How do Enrich.so and Forager compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and Forager?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, batch endpoints and webhooks.