Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs Icypeas

Icypeas wins 10 of 18 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Icypeas

Contact data and enrichment API: email discovery, verification, reverse lookup, find-people and bulk.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #11 of 29	Icypeas · #7 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	68.3%
Valid email rate	75.6%	68.3%
Latency p50	3,302ms	6,284ms
Cost / valid email	$0.0040	$0.013
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	24.4%	31.7%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	95.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	46.2%
Confidence-score quality	+62.5 pts	+53.8 pts
Geographic coverage	10	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #17 of 24	Icypeas · not in suite
Match rate	46.9%	-
Valid / reachable rate	82.6%	-
Latency p50	1,277ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.190	-
Right-person rate	89.5%	-
Mobile coverage	36.7%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	17.4%	-
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	91.3%	-
Geographic coverage	5	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #18 of 24	Icypeas · #12 of 24
Profile match rate	13.3%	83.7%
Identity accuracy	100.0%	100.0%
Latency p50	3,326ms	1,511ms
Price / matched profile	$0.0060	$0.013
Current employer accuracy	50.0%	90.2%
Move detection	-	75.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	50.0%	87.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	75.0%	78.0%
Work history completeness	1.0	7.5
Education completeness	50.0%	100.0%
Skills present	62.5%	24.4%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	0.0%	58.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · not in suite	Icypeas · #16 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	97.0%
Company name accuracy	-	94.8%
Latency p50	-	1,893ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.013
Industry accuracy	-	77.3%
Employee count ±20%	-	21.9%
HQ / location accuracy	-	81.4%
Description present	-	96.9%
Founding year accuracy	-	59.8%
Domains / social profiles	-	97.9%
Coverage by country / size	-	94.3%

Questions about Enrich.so vs Icypeas

Which is better, Enrich.so or Icypeas?

Icypeas wins 10 of the 18 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, Icypeas #7 of 29; People Data: Enrich.so #18 of 24, Icypeas #12 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or Icypeas?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, Icypeas $0.013; People Data, price per matched profile: Enrich.so $0.0060, Icypeas $0.013.

How do Enrich.so and Icypeas compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Icypeas holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and Icypeas?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Icypeas offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.