Head-to-head · B2B data

Crustdata vs Enrich.so

Crustdata wins 8 of 10 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Crustdata live

Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.

★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · not measured	Enrich.so · #11 of 29
Match rate	-	68.3%
Valid email rate	-	75.6%
Latency p50	-	3,302ms
Cost / valid email	-	$0.0040
Invalid rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all share	-	24.4%
Business email	-	100.0%
Right-person rate	-	95.1%
Decoy hit rate	-	20.0%
Catch-all detection	-	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+62.5 pts
Geographic coverage	-	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · not measured	Enrich.so · #17 of 24
Match rate	-	46.9%
Valid / reachable rate	-	82.6%
Latency p50	-	1,277ms
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.190
Right-person rate	-	89.5%
Mobile coverage	-	36.7%
Disconnected rate	-	0.0%
Low-activity share	-	17.4%
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	-	91.3%
Geographic coverage	-	5

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · #9 of 24	Enrich.so · #18 of 24
Profile match rate	95.9%	13.3%
Identity accuracy	97.9%	100.0%
Latency p50	1,046ms	3,326ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.0060
Current employer accuracy	91.5%	50.0%
Move detection	85.0%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	87.2%	50.0%
Seniority label accuracy	80.4%	-
Location accuracy	87.2%	75.0%
Work history completeness	7.5	1.0
Education completeness	100.0%	50.0%
Skills present	0.0%	62.5%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	0.0%

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · #6 of 6	Enrich.so · not in suite
Employer coverage	83.3%	-
Postings recall	47.6%	-
Latency p50	2,858ms	-
Cost / job	-	-
Closed or unknown postings	35.4%	-
Duplicate postings	13.8%	-
Location accuracy	96.6%	-
Posted-date accuracy	66.8%	-
Description present	100.0%	-
Coverage by country	81.3%	-

Questions about Crustdata vs Enrich.so

Which is better, Crustdata or Enrich.so?

Crustdata wins 8 of the 10 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Crustdata #9 of 24, Enrich.so #18 of 24.

How do Crustdata and Enrich.so compare in user reviews?

Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt; Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Crustdata and Enrich.so?

Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.