Head-to-head · B2B data

BetterContact vs Enrich.so

Dead heat on metrics won: pick on the dimension you buy. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

BetterContact
9
Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 20+ providers for emails and mobiles.
★ 4.8 · 44 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Enrich.so
9
Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric BetterContact · #6 of 29 Enrich.so · #11 of 29
Match rate90.9%68.3%
Valid email rate66.0%75.6%
Latency p5035,589ms3,302ms
Cost / valid email$0.060$0.0040
Invalid rate2.0%0.0%
Catch-all share32.0%24.4%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate98.0%95.1%
Decoy hit rate-20.0%
Catch-all detection81.3%100.0%
Confidence-score quality+78.7 pts+62.5 pts
Geographic coverage910
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric BetterContact · #3 of 24 Enrich.so · #17 of 24
Match rate87.8%46.9%
Valid / reachable rate88.4%82.6%
Latency p50-1,277ms
Cost / mobile number$0.452$0.190
Right-person rate92.3%89.5%
Mobile coverage77.6%36.7%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share11.6%17.4%
Landline / mobile classification--
Country accuracy83.7%91.3%
Geographic coverage95
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric BetterContact · not measured Enrich.so · #18 of 24
Profile match rate-13.3%
Identity accuracy-100.0%
Latency p50-3,326ms
Price / matched profile-$0.0060
Current employer accuracy-50.0%
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate-0.0%
Job title accuracy-50.0%
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy-75.0%
Work history completeness-1.0
Education completeness-50.0%
Skills present-62.5%
Social / profile URLs-100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority-0.0%

Questions about BetterContact vs Enrich.so

Which is better, BetterContact or Enrich.so?

They win the same number of metrics, 9 each, on the 2 benchmarks that measured both: pick on the data you buy. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: BetterContact #6 of 29, Enrich.so #11 of 29; Phone Data: BetterContact #3 of 24, Enrich.so #17 of 24.

Which is cheaper, BetterContact or Enrich.so?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: BetterContact $0.060, Enrich.so $0.0040; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: BetterContact $0.452, Enrich.so $0.190.

How do BetterContact and Enrich.so compare in user reviews?

BetterContact holds 4.8 / 5 across 44 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of BetterContact and Enrich.so?

BetterContact offers an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.

Compare BetterContact with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.