Head-to-head · B2B data

Cognism vs Enrich.so

Dead heat on metrics won: pick on the dimension you buy. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Cognism

Compliance-first sales intelligence with strong European coverage and phone-verified mobiles.

★ 4.5 · 1,628 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Integrations

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Cognism · #24 of 29	Enrich.so · #11 of 29
Match rate	66.1%	68.3%
Valid email rate	-	75.6%
Latency p50	-	3,302ms
Cost / valid email	-	$0.0040
Invalid rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all share	-	24.4%
Business email	-	100.0%
Right-person rate	-	95.1%
Decoy hit rate	-	20.0%
Catch-all detection	-	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+62.5 pts
Geographic coverage	-	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Cognism · #5 of 24	Enrich.so · #17 of 24
Match rate	73.5%	46.9%
Valid / reachable rate	-	82.6%
Latency p50	-	1,277ms
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.190
Right-person rate	-	89.5%
Mobile coverage	-	36.7%
Disconnected rate	-	0.0%
Low-activity share	-	17.4%
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	-	91.3%
Geographic coverage	-	5

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Cognism · not measured	Enrich.so · #18 of 24
Profile match rate	-	13.3%
Identity accuracy	-	100.0%
Latency p50	-	3,326ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.0060
Current employer accuracy	-	50.0%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	-	50.0%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	75.0%
Work history completeness	-	1.0
Education completeness	-	50.0%
Skills present	-	62.5%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	0.0%

Questions about Cognism vs Enrich.so

Which is better, Cognism or Enrich.so?

They win the same number of metrics, 1 each, on the 2 benchmarks that measured both: pick on the data you buy. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Cognism #24 of 29, Enrich.so #11 of 29; Phone Data: Cognism #5 of 24, Enrich.so #17 of 24.

How do Cognism and Enrich.so compare in user reviews?

Cognism holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,628 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Cognism and Enrich.so?

Cognism offers an MCP server, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations; Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and batch endpoints.