Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs Findymail

Findymail wins 10 of 17 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so
7
Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Findymail
10
Work-email finder and verifier focused on deliverability, with United States phone finding; commonly paired with LinkedIn / Sales Navigator workflows.
★ 4.9 · 64 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #11 of 29 Findymail · #2 of 29
Match rate68.3%86.7%
Valid email rate75.6%67.3%
Latency p503,302ms1,727ms
Cost / valid email$0.0040$0.020
Invalid rate0.0%1.9%
Catch-all share24.4%28.8%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate95.1%98.1%
Decoy hit rate20.0%20.0%
Catch-all detection100.0%-
Confidence-score quality+62.5 pts-
Geographic coverage109
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #17 of 24 Findymail · #8 of 24
Match rate46.9%51.0%
Valid / reachable rate82.6%100.0%
Latency p501,277ms1,910ms
Cost / mobile number$0.190$0.145
Right-person rate89.5%95.5%
Mobile coverage36.7%46.9%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share17.4%0.0%
Landline / mobile classification-100.0%
Country accuracy91.3%84.0%
Geographic coverage56
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #18 of 24 Findymail · not measured
Profile match rate13.3%-
Identity accuracy100.0%-
Latency p503,326ms-
Price / matched profile$0.0060-
Current employer accuracy50.0%-
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy50.0%-
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy75.0%-
Work history completeness1.0-
Education completeness50.0%-
Skills present62.5%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority0.0%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · not in suite Findymail · #18 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate-98.0%
Company name accuracy-92.9%
Latency p50-1,168ms
Price / matched company-$0.013
Industry accuracy-73.5%
Employee count ±20%-0.0%
HQ / location accuracy-80.6%
Description present-92.9%
Founding year accuracy-0.0%
Domains / social profiles-98.0%
Coverage by country / size-90.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · not in suite Findymail · #9 of 10
Coverage-39.0%
Detection accuracy-40.5%
Latency p50-807ms
Cost / lookup-$0.034
Live stack recall-6.6%
Technologies per domain-8
Dated results-100.0%
Coverage by geo / size-0.0%

Questions about Enrich.so vs Findymail

Which is better, Enrich.so or Findymail?

Findymail wins 10 of the 17 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, Findymail #2 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, Findymail #8 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or Findymail?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, Findymail $0.020; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Enrich.so $0.190, Findymail $0.145.

How do Enrich.so and Findymail compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Findymail holds 4.9 / 5 across 64 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and Findymail?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Findymail offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and webhooks.

Compare Enrich.so with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.