Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs LeadIQ

LeadIQ wins 11 of 20 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so
9
Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
LeadIQ
11
Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.
★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #11 of 29 LeadIQ · #17 of 29
Match rate68.3%78.3%
Valid email rate75.6%61.7%
Latency p503,302ms682ms
Cost / valid email$0.0040$0.074
Invalid rate0.0%2.1%
Catch-all share24.4%34.0%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate95.1%95.7%
Decoy hit rate20.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection100.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality+62.5 pts+63.0 pts
Geographic coverage108
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #17 of 24 LeadIQ · #7 of 24
Match rate46.9%83.7%
Valid / reachable rate82.6%82.9%
Latency p501,277ms680ms
Cost / mobile number$0.190$0.600
Right-person rate89.5%78.3%
Mobile coverage36.7%63.3%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share17.4%17.1%
Landline / mobile classification-92.5%
Country accuracy91.3%80.5%
Geographic coverage58
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #18 of 24 LeadIQ · not measured
Profile match rate13.3%-
Identity accuracy100.0%-
Latency p503,326ms-
Price / matched profile$0.0060-
Current employer accuracy50.0%-
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy50.0%-
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy75.0%-
Work history completeness1.0-
Education completeness50.0%-
Skills present62.5%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority0.0%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · not in suite LeadIQ · #17 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate-95.3%
Company name accuracy-98.4%
Latency p50-306ms
Price / matched company-$0.136
Industry accuracy-75.4%
Employee count ±20%-23.4%
HQ / location accuracy-77.0%
Description present-100.0%
Founding year accuracy-62.3%
Domains / social profiles-98.4%
Coverage by country / size-84.6%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · not in suite LeadIQ · #6 of 10
Coverage-93.8%
Detection accuracy-51.3%
Latency p50-306ms
Cost / lookup-$0.139
Live stack recall-76.5%
Technologies per domain-87
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-84.6%

Questions about Enrich.so vs LeadIQ

Which is better, Enrich.so or LeadIQ?

LeadIQ wins 11 of the 20 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, LeadIQ #17 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, LeadIQ #7 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or LeadIQ?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, LeadIQ $0.074; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Enrich.so $0.190, LeadIQ $0.600.

How do Enrich.so and LeadIQ compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and LeadIQ?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API and CSV export.

Compare Enrich.so with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.