Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs GetLeads

Enrich.so wins 18 of 27 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so
18
Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
GetLeads
9
B2B contact database of 478M+ verified contacts and enrichment built for AI agents: REST API and MCP, no dashboard.
★ 5.0 · 5 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #11 of 29 GetLeads · #22 of 29
Match rate68.3%46.7%
Valid email rate75.6%67.9%
Latency p503,302ms3,441ms
Cost / valid email$0.0040$0.157
Invalid rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all share24.4%32.1%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate95.1%100.0%
Decoy hit rate20.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection100.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality+62.5 pts-
Geographic coverage106
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #17 of 24 GetLeads · #21 of 24
Match rate46.9%36.7%
Valid / reachable rate82.6%72.2%
Latency p501,277ms3,420ms
Cost / mobile number$0.190$0.187
Right-person rate89.5%80.0%
Mobile coverage36.7%26.5%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share17.4%27.8%
Landline / mobile classification-100.0%
Country accuracy91.3%100.0%
Geographic coverage54
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Enrich.so · #18 of 24 GetLeads · #22 of 24
Profile match rate13.3%66.7%
Identity accuracy100.0%100.0%
Latency p503,326ms3,454ms
Price / matched profile$0.0060$0.074
Current employer accuracy50.0%97.5%
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy50.0%60.0%
Seniority label accuracy-62.5%
Location accuracy75.0%92.5%
Work history completeness1.0-
Education completeness50.0%0.0%
Skills present62.5%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority0.0%50.0%

Questions about Enrich.so vs GetLeads

Which is better, Enrich.so or GetLeads?

Enrich.so wins 18 of the 27 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, GetLeads #22 of 29; Phone Data: Enrich.so #17 of 24, GetLeads #21 of 24; People Data: Enrich.so #18 of 24, GetLeads #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or GetLeads?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, GetLeads $0.157; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Enrich.so $0.190, GetLeads $0.187; People Data, price per matched profile: Enrich.so $0.0060, GetLeads $0.074.

How do Enrich.so and GetLeads compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; GetLeads holds 5.0 / 5 across 5 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and GetLeads?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; GetLeads offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.

Compare Enrich.so with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.