Head-to-head · B2B data

Enrich.so vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 12 of 17 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Enrich.so

Credit-based enrichment API for work emails, phone numbers and reverse email lookup to a professional profile, with a lead finder and an MCP server.

No public reviews

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks

Hunter.io

Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #11 of 29	Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	75.0%
Valid email rate	75.6%	62.2%
Latency p50	3,302ms	2,252ms
Cost / valid email	$0.0040	$0.024
Invalid rate	0.0%	13.3%
Catch-all share	24.4%	24.4%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	95.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	+62.5 pts	+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage	10	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #17 of 24	Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate	46.9%	-
Valid / reachable rate	82.6%	-
Latency p50	1,277ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.190	-
Right-person rate	89.5%	-
Mobile coverage	36.7%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	17.4%	-
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	91.3%	-
Geographic coverage	5	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · #18 of 24	Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate	13.3%	44.9%
Identity accuracy	100.0%	100.0%
Latency p50	3,326ms	1,223ms
Price / matched profile	$0.0060	$0.0030
Current employer accuracy	50.0%	90.9%
Move detection	-	25.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	50.0%	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	75.0%	100.0%
Work history completeness	1.0	-
Education completeness	50.0%	0.0%
Skills present	62.5%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	0.0%	14.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · not in suite	Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	100.0%
Company name accuracy	-	96.0%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.0030
Industry accuracy	-	38.0%
Employee count ±20%	-	25.7%
HQ / location accuracy	-	83.0%
Description present	-	97.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	52.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	0.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	100.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Enrich.so · not in suite	Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage	-	95.0%
Detection accuracy	-	66.3%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Cost / lookup	-	$0.0032
Live stack recall	-	25.4%
Technologies per domain	-	13
Dated results	-	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	-	90.0%

Questions about Enrich.so vs Hunter.io

Which is better, Enrich.so or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 12 of the 17 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Enrich.so #11 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29; People Data: Enrich.so #18 of 24, Hunter.io #15 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Enrich.so or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Enrich.so $0.0040, Hunter.io $0.024; People Data, price per matched profile: Enrich.so $0.0060, Hunter.io $0.0030.

How do Enrich.so and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

Enrich.so has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Enrich.so and Hunter.io?

Enrich.so offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and webhooks.