Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs LeadIQ

LeadIQ wins 15 of 25 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma
10
Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.
★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · CSV · Integrations
LeadIQ
15
Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.
★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #13 of 29 LeadIQ · #17 of 29
Match rate70.0%78.3%
Valid email rate61.9%61.7%
Latency p507,321ms682ms
Cost / valid email$0.021$0.074
Invalid rate2.4%2.1%
Catch-all share35.7%34.0%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%95.7%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection0.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality-+63.0 pts
Geographic coverage88
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #12 of 24 LeadIQ · #7 of 24
Match rate65.3%83.7%
Valid / reachable rate84.4%82.9%
Latency p50-680ms
Cost / mobile number$0.469$0.600
Right-person rate100.0%78.3%
Mobile coverage55.1%63.3%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share15.6%17.1%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%92.5%
Country accuracy84.4%80.5%
Geographic coverage88
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #24 of 24 LeadIQ · not measured
Profile match rate69.4%-
Identity accuracy97.1%-
Latency p503,143ms-
Price / matched profile$0.026-
Current employer accuracy29.4%-
Move detection38.5%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy38.2%-
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy0.0%-
Work history completeness--
Education completeness0.0%-
Skills present0.0%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority33.3%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #23 of 23 LeadIQ · #17 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate91.0%95.3%
Company name accuracy95.6%98.4%
Latency p50667ms306ms
Price / matched company-$0.136
Industry accuracy74.7%75.4%
Employee count ±20%9.0%23.4%
HQ / location accuracy45.1%77.0%
Description present71.4%100.0%
Founding year accuracy56.0%62.3%
Domains / social profiles100.0%98.4%
Coverage by country / size84.0%84.6%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · not in suite LeadIQ · #6 of 10
Coverage-93.8%
Detection accuracy-51.3%
Latency p50-306ms
Cost / lookup-$0.139
Live stack recall-76.5%
Technologies per domain-87
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-84.6%

Questions about Datagma vs LeadIQ

Which is better, Datagma or LeadIQ?

LeadIQ wins 15 of the 25 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, LeadIQ #17 of 29; Phone Data: Datagma #12 of 24, LeadIQ #7 of 24; Company Data: Datagma #23 of 23, LeadIQ #17 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or LeadIQ?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, LeadIQ $0.074; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Datagma $0.469, LeadIQ $0.600.

How do Datagma and LeadIQ compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and LeadIQ?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.

Compare Datagma with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.