Head-to-head · B2B data

Coresignal vs Datagma

Coresignal wins 20 of 29 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Coresignal live
20
Structured public-web B2B datasets (employees, companies, jobs) with API, MCP and agentic search, a real-time employee endpoint that fetches at request time, and gated contact enrichment.
★ 4.8 · 12 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Datagma
9
Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.
★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · CSV · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Coresignal · #27 of 29 Datagma · #13 of 29
Match rate55.1%70.0%
Valid email rate37.0%61.9%
Latency p50928ms7,321ms
Cost / valid email$0.654$0.021
Invalid rate25.9%2.4%
Catch-all share33.3%35.7%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%100.0%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection11.1%0.0%
Confidence-score quality-16.7 pts-
Geographic coverage38
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Coresignal · not in suite Datagma · #12 of 24
Match rate-65.3%
Valid / reachable rate-84.4%
Latency p50--
Cost / mobile number-$0.469
Right-person rate-100.0%
Mobile coverage-55.1%
Disconnected rate-0.0%
Low-activity share-15.6%
Landline / mobile classification-100.0%
Country accuracy-84.4%
Geographic coverage-8
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Coresignal · #5 of 24 Datagma · #24 of 24
Profile match rate98.0%69.4%
Identity accuracy97.9%97.1%
Latency p50928ms3,143ms
Price / matched profile$0.133$0.026
Current employer accuracy93.8%29.4%
Move detection100.0%38.5%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy77.1%38.2%
Seniority label accuracy82.1%-
Location accuracy95.8%0.0%
Work history completeness7.0-
Education completeness87.5%0.0%
Skills present95.8%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority83.3%33.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Coresignal · #19 of 23 Datagma · #23 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate97.0%91.0%
Company name accuracy93.8%95.6%
Latency p501,039ms667ms
Price / matched company$0.133-
Industry accuracy78.4%74.7%
Employee count ±20%27.4%9.0%
HQ / location accuracy80.4%45.1%
Description present97.9%71.4%
Founding year accuracy59.8%56.0%
Domains / social profiles97.9%100.0%
Coverage by country / size94.3%84.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Coresignal · #8 of 10 Datagma · not in suite
Coverage86.0%-
Detection accuracy32.1%-
Latency p501,039ms-
Cost / lookup$0.150-
Live stack recall14.6%-
Technologies per domain51-
Dated results100.0%-
Coverage by geo / size75.0%-

Questions about Coresignal vs Datagma

Which is better, Coresignal or Datagma?

Coresignal wins 20 of the 29 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Coresignal #27 of 29, Datagma #13 of 29; People Data: Coresignal #5 of 24, Datagma #24 of 24; Company Data: Coresignal #19 of 23, Datagma #23 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Coresignal or Datagma?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Coresignal $0.654, Datagma $0.021; People Data, price per matched profile: Coresignal $0.133, Datagma $0.026.

How do Coresignal and Datagma compare in user reviews?

Coresignal holds 4.8 / 5 across 12 reviews on Datarade; Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Coresignal and Datagma?

Coresignal offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.

Compare Coresignal with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.