Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs Forager

Forager wins 14 of 22 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	Forager · #28 of 29
Match rate	70.0%	4.1%
Valid email rate	61.9%	50.0%
Latency p50	7,321ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.021	$0.190
Invalid rate	2.4%	0.0%
Catch-all share	35.7%	50.0%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	8	1

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	Forager · #19 of 24
Match rate	65.3%	42.9%
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	90.5%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	$0.316
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	55.1%	38.8%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	15.6%	9.5%
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	-
Country accuracy	84.4%	90.5%
Geographic coverage	8	7

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	Forager · #8 of 24
Profile match rate	69.4%	95.9%
Identity accuracy	97.1%	97.9%
Latency p50	3,143ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.026	$0.020
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	91.5%
Move detection	38.5%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	38.2%	85.1%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	0.0%	95.7%
Work history completeness	-	8.6
Education completeness	0.0%	100.0%
Skills present	0.0%	91.5%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	83.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	Forager · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	-
Company name accuracy	95.6%	-
Latency p50	667ms	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	74.7%	-
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	-
Description present	71.4%	-
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	-
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	-

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · not in suite	Forager · #5 of 10
Coverage	-	95.0%
Detection accuracy	-	63.5%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / lookup	-	$0.020
Live stack recall	-	44.0%
Technologies per domain	-	64
Dated results	-	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	-	85.0%

Questions about Datagma vs Forager

Which is better, Datagma or Forager?

Forager wins 14 of the 22 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, Forager #28 of 29; Phone Data: Datagma #12 of 24, Forager #19 of 24; People Data: Datagma #24 of 24, Forager #8 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or Forager?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, Forager $0.190; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Datagma $0.469, Forager $0.316; People Data, price per matched profile: Datagma $0.026, Forager $0.020.

How do Datagma and Forager compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and Forager?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API and native integrations.