Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs QuickEnrich

Datagma wins 11 of 16 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	70.0%	53.3%
Valid email rate	61.9%	53.1%
Latency p50	7,321ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.021	$0.0075
Invalid rate	2.4%	0.0%
Catch-all share	35.7%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	8	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	65.3%	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	75.0%
Latency p50	-	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	$0.0060
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	55.1%	16.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	8.3%
Low-activity share	15.6%	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	91.7%
Country accuracy	84.4%	91.7%
Geographic coverage	8	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	69.4%	-
Identity accuracy	97.1%	-
Latency p50	3,143ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.026	-
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	-
Move detection	38.5%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	38.2%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	0.0%	-
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	0.0%	-
Skills present	0.0%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	-
Company name accuracy	95.6%	-
Latency p50	667ms	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	74.7%	-
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	-
Description present	71.4%	-
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	-
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	-

Questions about Datagma vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Datagma or QuickEnrich?

Datagma wins 11 of the 16 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Datagma #12 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Datagma $0.469, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do Datagma and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.