Head-to-head · B2B data

Crustdata vs Datagma

Crustdata wins 9 of 9 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Crustdata live

Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.

★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · not measured	Datagma · #13 of 29
Match rate	-	70.0%
Valid email rate	-	61.9%
Latency p50	-	7,321ms
Cost / valid email	-	$0.021
Invalid rate	-	2.4%
Catch-all share	-	35.7%
Business email	-	100.0%
Right-person rate	-	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all detection	-	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	-	8

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · not measured	Datagma · #12 of 24
Match rate	-	65.3%
Valid / reachable rate	-	84.4%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.469
Right-person rate	-	100.0%
Mobile coverage	-	55.1%
Disconnected rate	-	0.0%
Low-activity share	-	15.6%
Landline / mobile classification	-	100.0%
Country accuracy	-	84.4%
Geographic coverage	-	8

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · #9 of 24	Datagma · #24 of 24
Profile match rate	95.9%	69.4%
Identity accuracy	97.9%	97.1%
Latency p50	1,046ms	3,143ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.026
Current employer accuracy	91.5%	29.4%
Move detection	85.0%	38.5%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	87.2%	38.2%
Seniority label accuracy	80.4%	-
Location accuracy	87.2%	0.0%
Work history completeness	7.5	-
Education completeness	100.0%	0.0%
Skills present	0.0%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	33.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · not measured	Datagma · #23 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	91.0%
Company name accuracy	-	95.6%
Latency p50	-	667ms
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	-	74.7%
Employee count ±20%	-	9.0%
HQ / location accuracy	-	45.1%
Description present	-	71.4%
Founding year accuracy	-	56.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	100.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	84.0%

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Crustdata · #6 of 6	Datagma · not in suite
Employer coverage	83.3%	-
Postings recall	47.6%	-
Latency p50	2,858ms	-
Cost / job	-	-
Closed or unknown postings	35.4%	-
Duplicate postings	13.8%	-
Location accuracy	96.6%	-
Posted-date accuracy	66.8%	-
Description present	100.0%	-
Coverage by country	81.3%	-

Questions about Crustdata vs Datagma

Which is better, Crustdata or Datagma?

Crustdata wins 9 of the 9 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Crustdata #9 of 24, Datagma #24 of 24.

How do Crustdata and Datagma compare in user reviews?

Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt; Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Crustdata and Datagma?

Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.