Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs Findymail

Findymail wins 14 of 27 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma
13
Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.
★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · CSV · Integrations
Findymail
14
Work-email finder and verifier focused on deliverability, with United States phone finding; commonly paired with LinkedIn / Sales Navigator workflows.
★ 4.9 · 64 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #13 of 29 Findymail · #2 of 29
Match rate70.0%86.7%
Valid email rate61.9%67.3%
Latency p507,321ms1,727ms
Cost / valid email$0.021$0.020
Invalid rate2.4%1.9%
Catch-all share35.7%28.8%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%98.1%
Decoy hit rate0.0%20.0%
Catch-all detection0.0%-
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage89
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #12 of 24 Findymail · #8 of 24
Match rate65.3%51.0%
Valid / reachable rate84.4%100.0%
Latency p50-1,910ms
Cost / mobile number$0.469$0.145
Right-person rate100.0%95.5%
Mobile coverage55.1%46.9%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share15.6%0.0%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%100.0%
Country accuracy84.4%84.0%
Geographic coverage86
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #24 of 24 Findymail · not measured
Profile match rate69.4%-
Identity accuracy97.1%-
Latency p503,143ms-
Price / matched profile$0.026-
Current employer accuracy29.4%-
Move detection38.5%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy38.2%-
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy0.0%-
Work history completeness--
Education completeness0.0%-
Skills present0.0%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority33.3%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · #23 of 23 Findymail · #18 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate91.0%98.0%
Company name accuracy95.6%92.9%
Latency p50667ms1,168ms
Price / matched company-$0.013
Industry accuracy74.7%73.5%
Employee count ±20%9.0%0.0%
HQ / location accuracy45.1%80.6%
Description present71.4%92.9%
Founding year accuracy56.0%0.0%
Domains / social profiles100.0%98.0%
Coverage by country / size84.0%90.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Datagma · not in suite Findymail · #9 of 10
Coverage-39.0%
Detection accuracy-40.5%
Latency p50-807ms
Cost / lookup-$0.034
Live stack recall-6.6%
Technologies per domain-8
Dated results-100.0%
Coverage by geo / size-0.0%

Questions about Datagma vs Findymail

Which is better, Datagma or Findymail?

Findymail wins 14 of the 27 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, Findymail #2 of 29; Phone Data: Datagma #12 of 24, Findymail #8 of 24; Company Data: Datagma #23 of 23, Findymail #18 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or Findymail?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, Findymail $0.020; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Datagma $0.469, Findymail $0.145.

How do Datagma and Findymail compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; Findymail holds 4.9 / 5 across 64 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and Findymail?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; Findymail offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.

Compare Datagma with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.