Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs Icypeas

Icypeas wins 25 of 30 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Icypeas

Contact data and enrichment API: email discovery, verification, reverse lookup, find-people and bulk.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	Icypeas · #7 of 29
Match rate	70.0%	68.3%
Valid email rate	61.9%	68.3%
Latency p50	7,321ms	6,284ms
Cost / valid email	$0.021	$0.013
Invalid rate	2.4%	0.0%
Catch-all share	35.7%	31.7%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	46.2%
Confidence-score quality	-	+53.8 pts
Geographic coverage	8	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	Icypeas · not in suite
Match rate	65.3%	-
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Mobile coverage	55.1%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	15.6%	-
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	-
Country accuracy	84.4%	-
Geographic coverage	8	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	Icypeas · #12 of 24
Profile match rate	69.4%	83.7%
Identity accuracy	97.1%	100.0%
Latency p50	3,143ms	1,511ms
Price / matched profile	$0.026	$0.013
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	90.2%
Move detection	38.5%	75.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	38.2%	87.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	0.0%	78.0%
Work history completeness	-	7.5
Education completeness	0.0%	100.0%
Skills present	0.0%	24.4%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	58.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	Icypeas · #16 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	97.0%
Company name accuracy	95.6%	94.8%
Latency p50	667ms	1,893ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.013
Industry accuracy	74.7%	77.3%
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	21.9%
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	81.4%
Description present	71.4%	96.9%
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	59.8%
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	97.9%
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	94.3%

Questions about Datagma vs Icypeas

Which is better, Datagma or Icypeas?

Icypeas wins 25 of the 30 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, Icypeas #7 of 29; People Data: Datagma #24 of 24, Icypeas #12 of 24; Company Data: Datagma #23 of 23, Icypeas #16 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or Icypeas?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, Icypeas $0.013; People Data, price per matched profile: Datagma $0.026, Icypeas $0.013.

How do Datagma and Icypeas compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; Icypeas holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and Icypeas?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; Icypeas offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.