Head-to-head · B2B data

BetterContact vs Datagma

BetterContact wins 12 of 17 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

BetterContact

Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 20+ providers for emails and mobiles.

★ 4.8 · 44 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	BetterContact · #6 of 29	Datagma · #13 of 29
Match rate	90.9%	70.0%
Valid email rate	66.0%	61.9%
Latency p50	35,589ms	7,321ms
Cost / valid email	$0.060	$0.021
Invalid rate	2.0%	2.4%
Catch-all share	32.0%	35.7%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	98.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all detection	81.3%	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	+78.7 pts	-
Geographic coverage	9	8

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	BetterContact · #3 of 24	Datagma · #12 of 24
Match rate	87.8%	65.3%
Valid / reachable rate	88.4%	84.4%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.452	$0.469
Right-person rate	92.3%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	77.6%	55.1%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	11.6%	15.6%
Landline / mobile classification	-	100.0%
Country accuracy	83.7%	84.4%
Geographic coverage	9	8

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	BetterContact · not measured	Datagma · #24 of 24
Profile match rate	-	69.4%
Identity accuracy	-	97.1%
Latency p50	-	3,143ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.026
Current employer accuracy	-	29.4%
Move detection	-	38.5%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	-	38.2%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	0.0%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	33.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	BetterContact · not measured	Datagma · #23 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	91.0%
Company name accuracy	-	95.6%
Latency p50	-	667ms
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	-	74.7%
Employee count ±20%	-	9.0%
HQ / location accuracy	-	45.1%
Description present	-	71.4%
Founding year accuracy	-	56.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	100.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	84.0%

Questions about BetterContact vs Datagma

Which is better, BetterContact or Datagma?

BetterContact wins 12 of the 17 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: BetterContact #6 of 29, Datagma #13 of 29; Phone Data: BetterContact #3 of 24, Datagma #12 of 24.

Which is cheaper, BetterContact or Datagma?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: BetterContact $0.060, Datagma $0.021; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: BetterContact $0.452, Datagma $0.469.

How do BetterContact and Datagma compare in user reviews?

BetterContact holds 4.8 / 5 across 44 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of BetterContact and Datagma?

BetterContact offers an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.