Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs Lusha

Lusha wins 23 of 34 decided metrics across 4 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Lusha

Sales intelligence with contact and company data, enrichment, signals and recommendations; extension and API v3.

★ 4.2 · 2,066 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	Lusha · #18 of 29
Match rate	70.0%	71.7%
Valid email rate	61.9%	62.8%
Latency p50	7,321ms	847ms
Cost / valid email	$0.021	$0.486
Invalid rate	2.4%	4.7%
Catch-all share	35.7%	30.2%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	97.7%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	8	6

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	Lusha · #6 of 24
Match rate	65.3%	81.6%
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	87.5%
Latency p50	-	739ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	$0.974
Right-person rate	100.0%	90.5%
Mobile coverage	55.1%	67.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	15.6%	12.5%
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	100.0%
Country accuracy	84.4%	85.0%
Geographic coverage	8	10

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	Lusha · #23 of 24
Profile match rate	69.4%	89.8%
Identity accuracy	97.1%	97.7%
Latency p50	3,143ms	739ms
Price / matched profile	$0.026	$0.122
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	93.2%
Move detection	38.5%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	38.2%	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	73.8%
Location accuracy	0.0%	95.5%
Work history completeness	-	0.8
Education completeness	0.0%	0.0%
Skills present	0.0%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	66.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	Lusha · #12 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	99.0%
Company name accuracy	95.6%	94.9%
Latency p50	667ms	778ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.219
Industry accuracy	74.7%	42.4%
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	27.0%
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	83.8%
Description present	71.4%	99.0%
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	71.7%
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	98.0%
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	95.0%

Questions about Datagma vs Lusha

Which is better, Datagma or Lusha?

Lusha wins 23 of the 34 metrics decided between them, across 4 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, Lusha #18 of 29; Phone Data: Datagma #12 of 24, Lusha #6 of 24; People Data: Datagma #24 of 24, Lusha #23 of 24; Company Data: Datagma #23 of 23, Lusha #12 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or Lusha?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, Lusha $0.486; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Datagma $0.469, Lusha $0.974; People Data, price per matched profile: Datagma $0.026, Lusha $0.122.

How do Datagma and Lusha compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; Lusha holds 4.2 / 5 across 2,066 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and Lusha?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; Lusha offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.