Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 18 of 28 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

Hunter.io

Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate	70.0%	75.0%
Valid email rate	61.9%	62.2%
Latency p50	7,321ms	2,252ms
Cost / valid email	$0.021	$0.024
Invalid rate	2.4%	13.3%
Catch-all share	35.7%	24.4%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage	8	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate	65.3%	-
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Mobile coverage	55.1%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	15.6%	-
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	-
Country accuracy	84.4%	-
Geographic coverage	8	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate	69.4%	44.9%
Identity accuracy	97.1%	100.0%
Latency p50	3,143ms	1,223ms
Price / matched profile	$0.026	$0.0030
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	90.9%
Move detection	38.5%	25.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	38.2%	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	0.0%	100.0%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	0.0%	0.0%
Skills present	0.0%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	14.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	100.0%
Company name accuracy	95.6%	96.0%
Latency p50	667ms	1,043ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.0030
Industry accuracy	74.7%	38.0%
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	25.7%
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	83.0%
Description present	71.4%	97.0%
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	52.0%
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	0.0%
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	100.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · not in suite	Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage	-	95.0%
Detection accuracy	-	66.3%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Cost / lookup	-	$0.0032
Live stack recall	-	25.4%
Technologies per domain	-	13
Dated results	-	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	-	90.0%

Questions about Datagma vs Hunter.io

Which is better, Datagma or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 18 of the 28 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Datagma #13 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29; People Data: Datagma #24 of 24, Hunter.io #15 of 24; Company Data: Datagma #23 of 23, Hunter.io #5 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Datagma or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Datagma $0.021, Hunter.io $0.024; People Data, price per matched profile: Datagma $0.026, Hunter.io $0.0030.

How do Datagma and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Datagma and Hunter.io?

Datagma offers an API, CSV export and native integrations; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, CSV export and native integrations.