Head-to-head · B2B data

Datagma vs HarvestAPI

No suite in this run measured both Datagma and HarvestAPI; each block below shows one of them alone.

Datagma

Synchronous B2B enrichment over a simple REST API with pay-per-match pricing.

★ 4.7 · 7 reviewsA

Access: API · CSV · Integrations

HarvestAPI live

Pay-as-you-go LinkedIn scraping API: live profiles, companies, jobs, posts and lead search without cookies, with optional email search on a profile. Also sold as Apify actors.

No public reviews

Access: API

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #13 of 29	HarvestAPI · not measured
Match rate	70.0%	-
Valid email rate	61.9%	-
Latency p50	7,321ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.021	-
Invalid rate	2.4%	-
Catch-all share	35.7%	-
Business email	100.0%	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	8	-

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #12 of 24	HarvestAPI · not in suite
Match rate	65.3%	-
Valid / reachable rate	84.4%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.469	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Mobile coverage	55.1%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	15.6%	-
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	-
Country accuracy	84.4%	-
Geographic coverage	8	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #24 of 24	HarvestAPI · not measured
Profile match rate	69.4%	-
Identity accuracy	97.1%	-
Latency p50	3,143ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.026	-
Current employer accuracy	29.4%	-
Move detection	38.5%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	38.2%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	0.0%	-
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	0.0%	-
Skills present	0.0%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	33.3%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · #23 of 23	HarvestAPI · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	91.0%	-
Company name accuracy	95.6%	-
Latency p50	667ms	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	74.7%	-
Employee count ±20%	9.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	45.1%	-
Description present	71.4%	-
Founding year accuracy	56.0%	-
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	84.0%	-

Live Profile Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-26

Metric	Datagma · not in suite	HarvestAPI · #2 of 5
Current-job accuracy	-	93.1%
Fetch success	-	99.0%
Latency p50	-	3,350ms
Cost / profile	-	$0.0037
Move detection	-	94.2%
Still at previous employer	-	2.4%
Control accuracy	-	91.8%
Work history completeness	-	9.1
Education completeness	-	99.0%

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Datagma · not in suite	HarvestAPI · #3 of 6
Employer coverage	-	95.0%
Postings recall	-	59.3%
Latency p50	-	4,579ms
Cost / job	-	$0.0001
Closed or unknown postings	-	10.6%
Duplicate postings	-	33.8%
Location accuracy	-	96.3%
Posted-date accuracy	-	32.8%
Description present	-	0.0%
Coverage by country	-	91.7%

Questions about Datagma vs HarvestAPI

Which is better, Datagma or HarvestAPI?

No benchmark in this run measured both, so they have no metric in common. Datagma is ranked on Email Data, Phone Data, People Data and Company Data; HarvestAPI is ranked on Live Profile Data and Jobs Data.

How do Datagma and HarvestAPI compare in user reviews?

Datagma holds 4.7 / 5 across 7 reviews on G2; HarvestAPI has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.