Head-to-head · B2B data

QuickEnrich vs Wiza

Wiza wins 10 of 15 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Wiza

LinkedIn-centric contact enrichment from a profile URL, with work-email verification; API, webhooks and MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,290 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29	Wiza · #8 of 29
Match rate	53.3%	81.6%
Valid email rate	53.1%	65.0%
Latency p50	2,641ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.0075	$0.077
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	43.8%	32.5%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	-	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	7	9

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24	Wiza · #10 of 24
Match rate	24.5%	77.6%
Valid / reachable rate	75.0%	81.6%
Latency p50	2,619ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.0060	$0.158
Right-person rate	100.0%	84.0%
Mobile coverage	16.3%	61.2%
Disconnected rate	8.3%	0.0%
Low-activity share	16.7%	18.4%
Landline / mobile classification	91.7%	97.4%
Country accuracy	91.7%	86.8%
Geographic coverage	3	7

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	QuickEnrich · not in suite	Wiza · #7 of 24
Profile match rate	-	98.0%
Identity accuracy	-	97.9%
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched profile	-	$0.025
Current employer accuracy	-	95.8%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	-	89.6%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	58.3%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	85.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	QuickEnrich · not measured	Wiza · #2 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	100.0%
Company name accuracy	-	96.0%
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	-	81.0%
Employee count ±20%	-	16.2%
HQ / location accuracy	-	80.0%
Description present	-	70.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	72.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	100.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	100.0%

Questions about QuickEnrich vs Wiza

Which is better, QuickEnrich or Wiza?

Wiza wins 10 of the 15 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: QuickEnrich #25 of 29, Wiza #8 of 29; Phone Data: QuickEnrich #22 of 24, Wiza #10 of 24.

Which is cheaper, QuickEnrich or Wiza?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: QuickEnrich $0.0075, Wiza $0.077; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: QuickEnrich $0.0060, Wiza $0.158.

How do QuickEnrich and Wiza compare in user reviews?

QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Wiza holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,290 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of QuickEnrich and Wiza?

QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export; Wiza offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API and CSV export.