Head-to-head · B2B data

Findymail vs QuickEnrich

Findymail wins 13 of 20 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Findymail
13
Work-email finder and verifier focused on deliverability, with United States phone finding; commonly paired with LinkedIn / Sales Navigator workflows.
★ 4.9 · 64 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
QuickEnrich
7
Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.
No public reviews
Access: API · CSV
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #2 of 29 QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate86.7%53.3%
Valid email rate67.3%53.1%
Latency p501,727ms2,641ms
Cost / valid email$0.020$0.0075
Invalid rate1.9%0.0%
Catch-all share28.8%43.8%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate98.1%100.0%
Decoy hit rate20.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage97
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #8 of 24 QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate51.0%24.5%
Valid / reachable rate100.0%75.0%
Latency p501,910ms2,619ms
Cost / mobile number$0.145$0.0060
Right-person rate95.5%100.0%
Mobile coverage46.9%16.3%
Disconnected rate0.0%8.3%
Low-activity share0.0%16.7%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%91.7%
Country accuracy84.0%91.7%
Geographic coverage63
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #18 of 23 QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate98.0%-
Company name accuracy92.9%-
Latency p501,168ms-
Price / matched company$0.013-
Industry accuracy73.5%-
Employee count ±20%0.0%-
HQ / location accuracy80.6%-
Description present92.9%-
Founding year accuracy0.0%-
Domains / social profiles98.0%-
Coverage by country / size90.0%-
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #9 of 10 QuickEnrich · not in suite
Coverage39.0%-
Detection accuracy40.5%-
Latency p50807ms-
Cost / lookup$0.034-
Live stack recall6.6%-
Technologies per domain8-
Dated results100.0%-
Coverage by geo / size0.0%-

Questions about Findymail vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Findymail or QuickEnrich?

Findymail wins 13 of the 20 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Findymail #2 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Findymail #8 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Findymail or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Findymail $0.020, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Findymail $0.145, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do Findymail and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Findymail holds 4.9 / 5 across 64 reviews on G2 and Capterra; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Findymail and QuickEnrich?

Findymail offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.

Compare Findymail with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.