Head-to-head · B2B data

Lusha vs QuickEnrich

Lusha wins 12 of 19 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Lusha

Sales intelligence with contact and company data, enrichment, signals and recommendations; extension and API v3.

★ 4.2 · 2,066 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Lusha · #18 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	71.7%	53.3%
Valid email rate	62.8%	53.1%
Latency p50	847ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.486	$0.0075
Invalid rate	4.7%	0.0%
Catch-all share	30.2%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	97.7%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	-	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	6	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Lusha · #6 of 24	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	81.6%	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	87.5%	75.0%
Latency p50	739ms	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.974	$0.0060
Right-person rate	90.5%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	67.3%	16.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	8.3%
Low-activity share	12.5%	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	91.7%
Country accuracy	85.0%	91.7%
Geographic coverage	10	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Lusha · #23 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	89.8%	-
Identity accuracy	97.7%	-
Latency p50	739ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.122	-
Current employer accuracy	93.2%	-
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	81.8%	-
Seniority label accuracy	73.8%	-
Location accuracy	95.5%	-
Work history completeness	0.8	-
Education completeness	0.0%	-
Skills present	0.0%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	66.7%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Lusha · #12 of 23	QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	99.0%	-
Company name accuracy	94.9%	-
Latency p50	778ms	-
Price / matched company	$0.219	-
Industry accuracy	42.4%	-
Employee count ±20%	27.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	83.8%	-
Description present	99.0%	-
Founding year accuracy	71.7%	-
Domains / social profiles	98.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	95.0%	-

Questions about Lusha vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Lusha or QuickEnrich?

Lusha wins 12 of the 19 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Lusha #18 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Lusha #6 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Lusha or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Lusha $0.486, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Lusha $0.974, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do Lusha and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Lusha holds 4.2 / 5 across 2,066 reviews on G2 and Capterra; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Lusha and QuickEnrich?

Lusha offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.