Head-to-head · B2B data

LeadMagic vs QuickEnrich

LeadMagic wins 11 of 19 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

LeadMagic

API-first B2B enrichment for GTM engineers and agents: REST, CLI, MCP and CSV across people, company, jobs, intent and technographics.

★ 4.3 · 19 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadMagic · #12 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	60.0%	53.3%
Valid email rate	66.7%	53.1%
Latency p50	6,502ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.015	$0.0075
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	33.3%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	97.2%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	9	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadMagic · #16 of 24	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	57.1%	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	85.7%	75.0%
Latency p50	1,803ms	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.064	$0.0060
Right-person rate	80.0%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	44.9%	16.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	8.3%
Low-activity share	14.3%	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	89.3%	91.7%
Country accuracy	85.7%	91.7%
Geographic coverage	5	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadMagic · #21 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	83.7%	-
Identity accuracy	100.0%	-
Latency p50	1,947ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.010	-
Current employer accuracy	92.7%	-
Move detection	13.5%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	48.8%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	95.1%	-
Work history completeness	0.1	-
Education completeness	0.0%	-
Skills present	0.0%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	66.7%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadMagic · #22 of 23	QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	92.0%	-
Company name accuracy	94.6%	-
Latency p50	1,273ms	-
Price / matched company	$0.010	-
Industry accuracy	77.2%	-
Employee count ±20%	16.2%	-
HQ / location accuracy	63.0%	-
Description present	98.9%	-
Founding year accuracy	58.7%	-
Domains / social profiles	98.9%	-
Coverage by country / size	75.0%	-

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadMagic · #4 of 6	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Employer coverage	85.0%	-
Postings recall	76.7%	-
Latency p50	9,729ms	-
Cost / job	$0.028	-
Closed or unknown postings	47.3%	-
Duplicate postings	16.7%	-
Location accuracy	97.3%	-
Posted-date accuracy	66.3%	-
Description present	0.0%	-
Coverage by country	78.6%	-

Questions about LeadMagic vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, LeadMagic or QuickEnrich?

LeadMagic wins 11 of the 19 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: LeadMagic #12 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: LeadMagic #16 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, LeadMagic or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: LeadMagic $0.015, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: LeadMagic $0.064, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do LeadMagic and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

LeadMagic holds 4.3 / 5 across 19 reviews on G2; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of LeadMagic and QuickEnrich?

LeadMagic offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.