Head-to-head · B2B data

Forager vs QuickEnrich

QuickEnrich wins 7 of 13 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #28 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	4.1%	53.3%
Valid email rate	50.0%	53.1%
Latency p50	-	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.190	$0.0075
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	50.0%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all detection	-	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	1	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #19 of 24	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	42.9%	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	90.5%	75.0%
Latency p50	-	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.316	$0.0060
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	38.8%	16.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	8.3%
Low-activity share	9.5%	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	-	91.7%
Country accuracy	90.5%	91.7%
Geographic coverage	7	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #8 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	95.9%	-
Identity accuracy	97.9%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched profile	$0.020	-
Current employer accuracy	91.5%	-
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	85.1%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	95.7%	-
Work history completeness	8.6	-
Education completeness	100.0%	-
Skills present	91.5%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	-

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #5 of 10	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Coverage	95.0%	-
Detection accuracy	63.5%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / lookup	$0.020	-
Live stack recall	44.0%	-
Technologies per domain	64	-
Dated results	0.0%	-
Coverage by geo / size	85.0%	-

Questions about Forager vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Forager or QuickEnrich?

QuickEnrich wins 7 of the 13 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Forager #28 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Forager #19 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

Which is cheaper, Forager or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Forager $0.190, QuickEnrich $0.0075; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Forager $0.316, QuickEnrich $0.0060.

How do Forager and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Forager and QuickEnrich?

Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API.