Head-to-head · B2B data

Coresignal vs QuickEnrich

QuickEnrich wins 4 of 7 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Coresignal live

Structured public-web B2B datasets (employees, companies, jobs) with API, MCP and agentic search, a real-time employee endpoint that fetches at request time, and gated contact enrichment.

★ 4.8 · 12 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Coresignal · #27 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	55.1%	53.3%
Valid email rate	37.0%	53.1%
Latency p50	928ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.654	$0.0075
Invalid rate	25.9%	0.0%
Catch-all share	33.3%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	11.1%	-
Confidence-score quality	-16.7 pts	-
Geographic coverage	3	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Coresignal · not in suite	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	-	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	-	75.0%
Latency p50	-	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.0060
Right-person rate	-	100.0%
Mobile coverage	-	16.3%
Disconnected rate	-	8.3%
Low-activity share	-	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	-	91.7%
Country accuracy	-	91.7%
Geographic coverage	-	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Coresignal · #5 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	98.0%	-
Identity accuracy	97.9%	-
Latency p50	928ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.133	-
Current employer accuracy	93.8%	-
Move detection	100.0%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	77.1%	-
Seniority label accuracy	82.1%	-
Location accuracy	95.8%	-
Work history completeness	7.0	-
Education completeness	87.5%	-
Skills present	95.8%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Coresignal · #19 of 23	QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	97.0%	-
Company name accuracy	93.8%	-
Latency p50	1,039ms	-
Price / matched company	$0.133	-
Industry accuracy	78.4%	-
Employee count ±20%	27.4%	-
HQ / location accuracy	80.4%	-
Description present	97.9%	-
Founding year accuracy	59.8%	-
Domains / social profiles	97.9%	-
Coverage by country / size	94.3%	-

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Coresignal · #8 of 10	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Coverage	86.0%	-
Detection accuracy	32.1%	-
Latency p50	1,039ms	-
Cost / lookup	$0.150	-
Live stack recall	14.6%	-
Technologies per domain	51	-
Dated results	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / size	75.0%	-

Questions about Coresignal vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Coresignal or QuickEnrich?

QuickEnrich wins 4 of the 7 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Coresignal #27 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29.

Which is cheaper, Coresignal or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Coresignal $0.654, QuickEnrich $0.0075.

How do Coresignal and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Coresignal holds 4.8 / 5 across 12 reviews on Datarade; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Coresignal and QuickEnrich?

Coresignal offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.