Head-to-head · B2B data

Cognism vs QuickEnrich

Cognism wins 2 of 2 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Cognism
2
Compliance-first sales intelligence with strong European coverage and phone-verified mobiles.
★ 4.5 · 1,628 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Integrations
QuickEnrich
0
Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.
No public reviews
Access: API · CSV
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Cognism · #24 of 29 QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate66.1%53.3%
Valid email rate-53.1%
Latency p50-2,641ms
Cost / valid email-$0.0075
Invalid rate-0.0%
Catch-all share-43.8%
Business email-100.0%
Right-person rate-100.0%
Decoy hit rate-0.0%
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage-7
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Cognism · #5 of 24 QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate73.5%24.5%
Valid / reachable rate-75.0%
Latency p50-2,619ms
Cost / mobile number-$0.0060
Right-person rate-100.0%
Mobile coverage-16.3%
Disconnected rate-8.3%
Low-activity share-16.7%
Landline / mobile classification-91.7%
Country accuracy-91.7%
Geographic coverage-3

Questions about Cognism vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Cognism or QuickEnrich?

Cognism wins 2 of the 2 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Cognism #24 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29; Phone Data: Cognism #5 of 24, QuickEnrich #22 of 24.

How do Cognism and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Cognism holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,628 reviews on G2 and Capterra; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Cognism and QuickEnrich?

Cognism offers an MCP server, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.

Compare Cognism with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.