Head-to-head · B2B data

Icypeas vs QuickEnrich

Icypeas wins 4 of 7 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Icypeas

Contact data and enrichment API: email discovery, verification, reverse lookup, find-people and bulk.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

QuickEnrich

Email and mobile finder built from crawled company websites, maps listings and public profiles, with a metered API or a flat unlimited API plan.

No public reviews

Access: API · CSV

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Icypeas · #7 of 29	QuickEnrich · #25 of 29
Match rate	68.3%	53.3%
Valid email rate	68.3%	53.1%
Latency p50	6,284ms	2,641ms
Cost / valid email	$0.013	$0.0075
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	31.7%	43.8%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	10.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	46.2%	-
Confidence-score quality	+53.8 pts	-
Geographic coverage	10	7

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Icypeas · not in suite	QuickEnrich · #22 of 24
Match rate	-	24.5%
Valid / reachable rate	-	75.0%
Latency p50	-	2,619ms
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.0060
Right-person rate	-	100.0%
Mobile coverage	-	16.3%
Disconnected rate	-	8.3%
Low-activity share	-	16.7%
Landline / mobile classification	-	91.7%
Country accuracy	-	91.7%
Geographic coverage	-	3

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Icypeas · #12 of 24	QuickEnrich · not in suite
Profile match rate	83.7%	-
Identity accuracy	100.0%	-
Latency p50	1,511ms	-
Price / matched profile	$0.013	-
Current employer accuracy	90.2%	-
Move detection	75.0%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	87.8%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	78.0%	-
Work history completeness	7.5	-
Education completeness	100.0%	-
Skills present	24.4%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	58.3%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Icypeas · #16 of 23	QuickEnrich · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	97.0%	-
Company name accuracy	94.8%	-
Latency p50	1,893ms	-
Price / matched company	$0.013	-
Industry accuracy	77.3%	-
Employee count ±20%	21.9%	-
HQ / location accuracy	81.4%	-
Description present	96.9%	-
Founding year accuracy	59.8%	-
Domains / social profiles	97.9%	-
Coverage by country / size	94.3%	-

Questions about Icypeas vs QuickEnrich

Which is better, Icypeas or QuickEnrich?

Icypeas wins 4 of the 7 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Icypeas #7 of 29, QuickEnrich #25 of 29.

Which is cheaper, Icypeas or QuickEnrich?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Icypeas $0.013, QuickEnrich $0.0075.

How do Icypeas and QuickEnrich compare in user reviews?

Icypeas holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2; QuickEnrich has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Icypeas and QuickEnrich?

Icypeas offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; QuickEnrich offers an API and CSV export. Both offer an API and CSV export.