Head-to-head · B2B data

FullEnrich vs Lusha

FullEnrich wins 13 of 17 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

FullEnrich

Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 25+ sources for email and mobile, with reverse email lookup.

★ 4.8 · 263 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Lusha

Sales intelligence with contact and company data, enrichment, signals and recommendations; extension and API v3.

★ 4.2 · 2,066 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #4 of 29	Lusha · #18 of 29
Match rate	96.2%	71.7%
Valid email rate	66.0%	62.8%
Latency p50	40,638ms	847ms
Cost / valid email	$0.077	$0.486
Invalid rate	0.0%	4.7%
Catch-all share	32.0%	30.2%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	97.7%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	+94.4 pts	-
Geographic coverage	8	6

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #1 of 24	Lusha · #6 of 24
Match rate	83.7%	81.6%
Valid / reachable rate	97.6%	87.5%
Latency p50	-	739ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.523	$0.974
Right-person rate	100.0%	90.5%
Mobile coverage	81.6%	67.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	2.4%	12.5%
Landline / mobile classification	-	100.0%
Country accuracy	92.7%	85.0%
Geographic coverage	9	10

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Lusha · #23 of 24
Profile match rate	-	89.8%
Identity accuracy	-	97.7%
Latency p50	-	739ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.122
Current employer accuracy	-	93.2%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	-	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	73.8%
Location accuracy	-	95.5%
Work history completeness	-	0.8
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	66.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Lusha · #12 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	99.0%
Company name accuracy	-	94.9%
Latency p50	-	778ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.219
Industry accuracy	-	42.4%
Employee count ±20%	-	27.0%
HQ / location accuracy	-	83.8%
Description present	-	99.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	71.7%
Domains / social profiles	-	98.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	95.0%

Questions about FullEnrich vs Lusha

Which is better, FullEnrich or Lusha?

FullEnrich wins 13 of the 17 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: FullEnrich #4 of 29, Lusha #18 of 29; Phone Data: FullEnrich #1 of 24, Lusha #6 of 24.

Which is cheaper, FullEnrich or Lusha?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: FullEnrich $0.077, Lusha $0.486; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: FullEnrich $0.523, Lusha $0.974.

How do FullEnrich and Lusha compare in user reviews?

FullEnrich holds 4.8 / 5 across 263 reviews on G2 and Product Hunt; Lusha holds 4.2 / 5 across 2,066 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of FullEnrich and Lusha?

FullEnrich offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Lusha offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.