Head-to-head · B2B data

LeadIQ vs Lusha

Lusha wins 15 of 29 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

LeadIQ

Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.

★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations

Lusha

Sales intelligence with contact and company data, enrichment, signals and recommendations; extension and API v3.

★ 4.2 · 2,066 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadIQ · #17 of 29	Lusha · #18 of 29
Match rate	78.3%	71.7%
Valid email rate	61.7%	62.8%
Latency p50	682ms	847ms
Cost / valid email	$0.074	$0.486
Invalid rate	2.1%	4.7%
Catch-all share	34.0%	30.2%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	95.7%	97.7%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	0.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	+63.0 pts	-
Geographic coverage	8	6

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadIQ · #7 of 24	Lusha · #6 of 24
Match rate	83.7%	81.6%
Valid / reachable rate	82.9%	87.5%
Latency p50	680ms	739ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.600	$0.974
Right-person rate	78.3%	90.5%
Mobile coverage	63.3%	67.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	17.1%	12.5%
Landline / mobile classification	92.5%	100.0%
Country accuracy	80.5%	85.0%
Geographic coverage	8	10

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadIQ · not measured	Lusha · #23 of 24
Profile match rate	-	89.8%
Identity accuracy	-	97.7%
Latency p50	-	739ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.122
Current employer accuracy	-	93.2%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	-	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	73.8%
Location accuracy	-	95.5%
Work history completeness	-	0.8
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	66.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadIQ · #17 of 23	Lusha · #12 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	95.3%	99.0%
Company name accuracy	98.4%	94.9%
Latency p50	306ms	778ms
Price / matched company	$0.136	$0.219
Industry accuracy	75.4%	42.4%
Employee count ±20%	23.4%	27.0%
HQ / location accuracy	77.0%	83.8%
Description present	100.0%	99.0%
Founding year accuracy	62.3%	71.7%
Domains / social profiles	98.4%	98.0%
Coverage by country / size	84.6%	95.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	LeadIQ · #6 of 10	Lusha · not measured
Coverage	93.8%	-
Detection accuracy	51.3%	-
Latency p50	306ms	-
Cost / lookup	$0.139	-
Live stack recall	76.5%	-
Technologies per domain	87	-
Dated results	0.0%	-
Coverage by geo / size	84.6%	-

Questions about LeadIQ vs Lusha

Which is better, LeadIQ or Lusha?

Lusha wins 15 of the 29 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: LeadIQ #17 of 29, Lusha #18 of 29; Phone Data: LeadIQ #7 of 24, Lusha #6 of 24; Company Data: LeadIQ #17 of 23, Lusha #12 of 23.

Which is cheaper, LeadIQ or Lusha?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: LeadIQ $0.074, Lusha $0.486; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: LeadIQ $0.600, Lusha $0.974; Company Data, price per matched company: LeadIQ $0.136, Lusha $0.219.

How do LeadIQ and Lusha compare in user reviews?

LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt; Lusha holds 4.2 / 5 across 2,066 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of LeadIQ and Lusha?

LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations; Lusha offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations.