Head-to-head · B2B data

Fiber AI vs Lusha

Fiber AI wins 22 of 39 decided metrics across 4 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Fiber AI live
22
B2B search and enrichment API with waterfall contact reveal, job-posting search and live LinkedIn profile and company fetch, over REST, official SDKs and MCP.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Lusha
17
Sales intelligence with contact and company data, enrichment, signals and recommendations; extension and API v3.
★ 4.2 · 2,066 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #16 of 29 Lusha · #18 of 29
Match rate77.6%71.7%
Valid email rate63.2%62.8%
Latency p5017,360ms847ms
Cost / valid email$0.057$0.486
Invalid rate2.6%4.7%
Catch-all share31.6%30.2%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate97.4%97.7%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage86
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #18 of 24 Lusha · #6 of 24
Match rate46.9%81.6%
Valid / reachable rate78.3%87.5%
Latency p504,967ms739ms
Cost / mobile number$0.069$0.974
Right-person rate73.7%90.5%
Mobile coverage36.7%67.3%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share21.7%12.5%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%100.0%
Country accuracy91.3%85.0%
Geographic coverage510
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #10 of 24 Lusha · #23 of 24
Profile match rate95.9%89.8%
Identity accuracy97.9%97.7%
Latency p501,136ms739ms
Price / matched profile$0.036$0.122
Current employer accuracy89.4%93.2%
Move detection94.2%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy78.7%81.8%
Seniority label accuracy20.5%73.8%
Location accuracy95.7%95.5%
Work history completeness7.80.8
Education completeness100.0%0.0%
Skills present57.4%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority83.3%66.7%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #7 of 23 Lusha · #12 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate100.0%99.0%
Company name accuracy95.0%94.9%
Latency p501,131ms778ms
Price / matched company$0.036$0.219
Industry accuracy77.0%42.4%
Employee count ±20%27.0%27.0%
HQ / location accuracy85.0%83.8%
Description present97.0%99.0%
Founding year accuracy69.0%71.7%
Domains / social profiles100.0%98.0%
Coverage by country / size100.0%95.0%
Live Profile Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-26
Metric Fiber AI · #3 of 5 Lusha · not in suite
Current-job accuracy93.1%-
Fetch success98.0%-
Latency p505,381ms-
Cost / profile$0.037-
Move detection94.2%-
Still at previous employer4.8%-
Control accuracy91.8%-
Work history completeness8.6-
Education completeness99.0%-
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #10 of 10 Lusha · not measured
Coverage83.0%-
Detection accuracy18.0%-
Latency p501,131ms-
Cost / lookup$0.043-
Live stack recall6.6%-
Technologies per domain3-
Dated results0.0%-
Coverage by geo / size65.0%-

Questions about Fiber AI vs Lusha

Which is better, Fiber AI or Lusha?

Fiber AI wins 22 of the 39 metrics decided between them, across 4 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Fiber AI #16 of 29, Lusha #18 of 29; Phone Data: Fiber AI #18 of 24, Lusha #6 of 24; People Data: Fiber AI #10 of 24, Lusha #23 of 24; Company Data: Fiber AI #7 of 23, Lusha #12 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Fiber AI or Lusha?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Fiber AI $0.057, Lusha $0.486; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Fiber AI $0.069, Lusha $0.974; People Data, price per matched profile: Fiber AI $0.036, Lusha $0.122; Company Data, price per matched company: Fiber AI $0.036, Lusha $0.219.

How do Fiber AI and Lusha compare in user reviews?

Fiber AI has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Lusha holds 4.2 / 5 across 2,066 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Fiber AI and Lusha?

Fiber AI offers an MCP server, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Lusha offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.

Compare Fiber AI with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.