Head-to-head · B2B data

Forager vs LeadIQ

Forager wins 11 of 21 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

LeadIQ

Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.

★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #28 of 29	LeadIQ · #17 of 29
Match rate	4.1%	78.3%
Valid email rate	50.0%	61.7%
Latency p50	-	682ms
Cost / valid email	$0.190	$0.074
Invalid rate	0.0%	2.1%
Catch-all share	50.0%	34.0%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	95.7%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Catch-all detection	-	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+63.0 pts
Geographic coverage	1	8

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #19 of 24	LeadIQ · #7 of 24
Match rate	42.9%	83.7%
Valid / reachable rate	90.5%	82.9%
Latency p50	-	680ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.316	$0.600
Right-person rate	100.0%	78.3%
Mobile coverage	38.8%	63.3%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	9.5%	17.1%
Landline / mobile classification	-	92.5%
Country accuracy	90.5%	80.5%
Geographic coverage	7	8

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #8 of 24	LeadIQ · not measured
Profile match rate	95.9%	-
Identity accuracy	97.9%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched profile	$0.020	-
Current employer accuracy	91.5%	-
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	85.1%	-
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	95.7%	-
Work history completeness	8.6	-
Education completeness	100.0%	-
Skills present	91.5%	-
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	-

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · not measured	LeadIQ · #17 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	95.3%
Company name accuracy	-	98.4%
Latency p50	-	306ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.136
Industry accuracy	-	75.4%
Employee count ±20%	-	23.4%
HQ / location accuracy	-	77.0%
Description present	-	100.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	62.3%
Domains / social profiles	-	98.4%
Coverage by country / size	-	84.6%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #5 of 10	LeadIQ · #6 of 10
Coverage	95.0%	93.8%
Detection accuracy	63.5%	51.3%
Latency p50	-	306ms
Cost / lookup	$0.020	$0.139
Live stack recall	44.0%	76.5%
Technologies per domain	64	87
Dated results	0.0%	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	85.0%	84.6%

Questions about Forager vs LeadIQ

Which is better, Forager or LeadIQ?

Forager wins 11 of the 21 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Forager #28 of 29, LeadIQ #17 of 29; Phone Data: Forager #19 of 24, LeadIQ #7 of 24; Technographic Data: Forager #5 of 10, LeadIQ #6 of 10.

Which is cheaper, Forager or LeadIQ?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Forager $0.190, LeadIQ $0.074; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Forager $0.316, LeadIQ $0.600; Technographic Data, cost per lookup: Forager $0.020, LeadIQ $0.139.

How do Forager and LeadIQ compare in user reviews?

Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2; LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Forager and LeadIQ?

Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an API and native integrations.