Head-to-head · B2B data

Findymail vs Forager

Dead heat on metrics won: pick on the dimension you buy. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Findymail
11
Work-email finder and verifier focused on deliverability, with United States phone finding; commonly paired with LinkedIn / Sales Navigator workflows.
★ 4.9 · 64 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
Forager
11
People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.
★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #2 of 29 Forager · #28 of 29
Match rate86.7%4.1%
Valid email rate67.3%50.0%
Latency p501,727ms-
Cost / valid email$0.020$0.190
Invalid rate1.9%0.0%
Catch-all share28.8%50.0%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate98.1%100.0%
Decoy hit rate20.0%-
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage91
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #8 of 24 Forager · #19 of 24
Match rate51.0%42.9%
Valid / reachable rate100.0%90.5%
Latency p501,910ms-
Cost / mobile number$0.145$0.316
Right-person rate95.5%100.0%
Mobile coverage46.9%38.8%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share0.0%9.5%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%-
Country accuracy84.0%90.5%
Geographic coverage67
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · not measured Forager · #8 of 24
Profile match rate-95.9%
Identity accuracy-97.9%
Latency p50--
Price / matched profile-$0.020
Current employer accuracy-91.5%
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate--
Job title accuracy-85.1%
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy-95.7%
Work history completeness-8.6
Education completeness-100.0%
Skills present-91.5%
Social / profile URLs-100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority-83.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #18 of 23 Forager · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate98.0%-
Company name accuracy92.9%-
Latency p501,168ms-
Price / matched company$0.013-
Industry accuracy73.5%-
Employee count ±20%0.0%-
HQ / location accuracy80.6%-
Description present92.9%-
Founding year accuracy0.0%-
Domains / social profiles98.0%-
Coverage by country / size90.0%-
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Findymail · #9 of 10 Forager · #5 of 10
Coverage39.0%95.0%
Detection accuracy40.5%63.5%
Latency p50807ms-
Cost / lookup$0.034$0.020
Live stack recall6.6%44.0%
Technologies per domain864
Dated results100.0%0.0%
Coverage by geo / size0.0%85.0%

Questions about Findymail vs Forager

Which is better, Findymail or Forager?

They win the same number of metrics, 11 each, on the 3 benchmarks that measured both: pick on the data you buy. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Findymail #2 of 29, Forager #28 of 29; Phone Data: Findymail #8 of 24, Forager #19 of 24; Technographic Data: Findymail #9 of 10, Forager #5 of 10.

Which is cheaper, Findymail or Forager?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Findymail $0.020, Forager $0.190; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: Findymail $0.145, Forager $0.316; Technographic Data, cost per lookup: Findymail $0.034, Forager $0.020.

How do Findymail and Forager compare in user reviews?

Findymail holds 4.9 / 5 across 64 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Findymail and Forager?

Findymail offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations; Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, webhooks and native integrations.

Compare Findymail with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.