Head-to-head · B2B data

Forager vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 11 of 20 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Hunter.io

Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #28 of 29	Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate	4.1%	75.0%
Valid email rate	50.0%	62.2%
Latency p50	-	2,252ms
Cost / valid email	$0.190	$0.024
Invalid rate	0.0%	13.3%
Catch-all share	50.0%	24.4%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	10.0%
Catch-all detection	-	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage	1	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #19 of 24	Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate	42.9%	-
Valid / reachable rate	90.5%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.316	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Mobile coverage	38.8%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	9.5%	-
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	90.5%	-
Geographic coverage	7	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #8 of 24	Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate	95.9%	44.9%
Identity accuracy	97.9%	100.0%
Latency p50	-	1,223ms
Price / matched profile	$0.020	$0.0030
Current employer accuracy	91.5%	90.9%
Move detection	-	25.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	85.1%	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	95.7%	100.0%
Work history completeness	8.6	-
Education completeness	100.0%	0.0%
Skills present	91.5%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	83.3%	14.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · not measured	Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	100.0%
Company name accuracy	-	96.0%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.0030
Industry accuracy	-	38.0%
Employee count ±20%	-	25.7%
HQ / location accuracy	-	83.0%
Description present	-	97.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	52.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	0.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	100.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Forager · #5 of 10	Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage	95.0%	95.0%
Detection accuracy	63.5%	66.3%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Cost / lookup	$0.020	$0.0032
Live stack recall	44.0%	25.4%
Technologies per domain	64	13
Dated results	0.0%	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	85.0%	90.0%

Questions about Forager vs Hunter.io

Which is better, Forager or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 11 of the 20 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Forager #28 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29; People Data: Forager #8 of 24, Hunter.io #15 of 24; Technographic Data: Forager #5 of 10, Hunter.io #3 of 10.

Which is cheaper, Forager or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Forager $0.190, Hunter.io $0.024; People Data, price per matched profile: Forager $0.020, Hunter.io $0.0030; Technographic Data, cost per lookup: Forager $0.020, Hunter.io $0.0032.

How do Forager and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Forager and Hunter.io?

Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, webhooks and native integrations.