Head-to-head · B2B data

ContactOut vs Forager

Forager wins 17 of 27 decided metrics across 4 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

ContactOut

Contact data for recruiting and sales: browser extension, search / enrichment and API, personal and work emails.

★ 4.5 · 128 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Forager

People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.

★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA

Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	ContactOut · #14 of 29	Forager · #28 of 29
Match rate	69.4%	4.1%
Valid email rate	64.7%	50.0%
Latency p50	1,024ms	-
Cost / valid email	-	$0.190
Invalid rate	11.8%	0.0%
Catch-all share	20.6%	50.0%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	94.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Catch-all detection	71.4%	-
Confidence-score quality	+63.5 pts	-
Geographic coverage	9	1

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	ContactOut · #9 of 24	Forager · #19 of 24
Match rate	85.7%	42.9%
Valid / reachable rate	73.8%	90.5%
Latency p50	490ms	-
Cost / mobile number	-	$0.316
Right-person rate	88.5%	100.0%
Mobile coverage	55.1%	38.8%
Disconnected rate	7.1%	0.0%
Low-activity share	19.0%	9.5%
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	83.3%	90.5%
Geographic coverage	9	7

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	ContactOut · #11 of 24	Forager · #8 of 24
Profile match rate	91.8%	95.9%
Identity accuracy	97.8%	97.9%
Latency p50	898ms	-
Price / matched profile	-	$0.020
Current employer accuracy	97.8%	91.5%
Move detection	75.0%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Job title accuracy	86.7%	85.1%
Seniority label accuracy	81.6%	-
Location accuracy	95.6%	95.7%
Work history completeness	8.2	8.6
Education completeness	100.0%	100.0%
Skills present	91.1%	91.5%
Social / profile URLs	100.0%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	80.0%	83.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	ContactOut · #11 of 23	Forager · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	97.0%	-
Company name accuracy	95.9%	-
Latency p50	707ms	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	77.3%	-
Employee count ±20%	26.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	93.8%	-
Description present	96.9%	-
Founding year accuracy	69.1%	-
Domains / social profiles	100.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	90.0%	-

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	ContactOut · #7 of 10	Forager · #5 of 10
Coverage	85.0%	95.0%
Detection accuracy	35.5%	63.5%
Latency p50	707ms	-
Cost / lookup	-	$0.020
Live stack recall	37.1%	44.0%
Technologies per domain	80	64
Dated results	0.0%	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	70.0%	85.0%

Questions about ContactOut vs Forager

Which is better, ContactOut or Forager?

Forager wins 17 of the 27 metrics decided between them, across 4 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: ContactOut #14 of 29, Forager #28 of 29; Phone Data: ContactOut #9 of 24, Forager #19 of 24; People Data: ContactOut #11 of 24, Forager #8 of 24; Technographic Data: ContactOut #7 of 10, Forager #5 of 10.

How do ContactOut and Forager compare in user reviews?

ContactOut holds 4.5 / 5 across 128 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of ContactOut and Forager?

ContactOut offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.