Head-to-head · B2B data

Crustdata vs Forager

Forager wins 3 of 4 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Crustdata live
1
Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.
★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Forager
3
People, organisation and job-post APIs for sourcing and talent intelligence, with contact reveal.
★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: API · Dataset · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured Forager · #28 of 29
Match rate-4.1%
Valid email rate-50.0%
Latency p50--
Cost / valid email-$0.190
Invalid rate-0.0%
Catch-all share-50.0%
Business email-100.0%
Right-person rate-100.0%
Decoy hit rate--
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage-1
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured Forager · #19 of 24
Match rate-42.9%
Valid / reachable rate-90.5%
Latency p50--
Cost / mobile number-$0.316
Right-person rate-100.0%
Mobile coverage-38.8%
Disconnected rate-0.0%
Low-activity share-9.5%
Landline / mobile classification--
Country accuracy-90.5%
Geographic coverage-7
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · #9 of 24 Forager · #8 of 24
Profile match rate95.9%95.9%
Identity accuracy97.9%97.9%
Latency p501,046ms-
Price / matched profile-$0.020
Current employer accuracy91.5%91.5%
Move detection85.0%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy87.2%85.1%
Seniority label accuracy80.4%-
Location accuracy87.2%95.7%
Work history completeness7.58.6
Education completeness100.0%100.0%
Skills present0.0%91.5%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority83.3%83.3%
Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · #6 of 6 Forager · not measured
Employer coverage83.3%-
Postings recall47.6%-
Latency p502,858ms-
Cost / job--
Closed or unknown postings35.4%-
Duplicate postings13.8%-
Location accuracy96.6%-
Posted-date accuracy66.8%-
Description present100.0%-
Coverage by country81.3%-
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured Forager · #5 of 10
Coverage-95.0%
Detection accuracy-63.5%
Latency p50--
Cost / lookup-$0.020
Live stack recall-44.0%
Technologies per domain-64
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-85.0%

Questions about Crustdata vs Forager

Which is better, Crustdata or Forager?

Forager wins 3 of the 4 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Crustdata #9 of 24, Forager #8 of 24.

How do Crustdata and Forager compare in user reviews?

Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt; Forager holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Crustdata and Forager?

Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Forager offers an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an API, dataset delivery, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.

Compare Crustdata with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.