Head-to-head · B2B data

GetLeads vs LeadIQ

LeadIQ wins 10 of 18 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

GetLeads
8
B2B contact database of 478M+ verified contacts and enrichment built for AI agents: REST API and MCP, no dashboard.
★ 5.0 · 5 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
LeadIQ
10
Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.
★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #22 of 29 LeadIQ · #17 of 29
Match rate46.7%78.3%
Valid email rate67.9%61.7%
Latency p503,441ms682ms
Cost / valid email$0.157$0.074
Invalid rate0.0%2.1%
Catch-all share32.1%34.0%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%95.7%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection0.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality-+63.0 pts
Geographic coverage68
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #21 of 24 LeadIQ · #7 of 24
Match rate36.7%83.7%
Valid / reachable rate72.2%82.9%
Latency p503,420ms680ms
Cost / mobile number$0.187$0.600
Right-person rate80.0%78.3%
Mobile coverage26.5%63.3%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share27.8%17.1%
Landline / mobile classification100.0%92.5%
Country accuracy100.0%80.5%
Geographic coverage48
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #22 of 24 LeadIQ · not measured
Profile match rate66.7%-
Identity accuracy100.0%-
Latency p503,454ms-
Price / matched profile$0.074-
Current employer accuracy97.5%-
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy60.0%-
Seniority label accuracy62.5%-
Location accuracy92.5%-
Work history completeness--
Education completeness0.0%-
Skills present0.0%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority50.0%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · not measured LeadIQ · #17 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate-95.3%
Company name accuracy-98.4%
Latency p50-306ms
Price / matched company-$0.136
Industry accuracy-75.4%
Employee count ±20%-23.4%
HQ / location accuracy-77.0%
Description present-100.0%
Founding year accuracy-62.3%
Domains / social profiles-98.4%
Coverage by country / size-84.6%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · not measured LeadIQ · #6 of 10
Coverage-93.8%
Detection accuracy-51.3%
Latency p50-306ms
Cost / lookup-$0.139
Live stack recall-76.5%
Technologies per domain-87
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-84.6%

Questions about GetLeads vs LeadIQ

Which is better, GetLeads or LeadIQ?

LeadIQ wins 10 of the 18 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: GetLeads #22 of 29, LeadIQ #17 of 29; Phone Data: GetLeads #21 of 24, LeadIQ #7 of 24.

Which is cheaper, GetLeads or LeadIQ?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: GetLeads $0.157, LeadIQ $0.074; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: GetLeads $0.187, LeadIQ $0.600.

How do GetLeads and LeadIQ compare in user reviews?

GetLeads holds 5.0 / 5 across 5 reviews on G2 and Capterra; LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of GetLeads and LeadIQ?

GetLeads offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API and CSV export.

Compare GetLeads with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.