Head-to-head · B2B data

Hunter.io vs LeadIQ

Hunter.io wins 16 of 29 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Hunter.io
16
Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.
★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
LeadIQ
13
Prospecting platform built around a Chrome extension: verified work emails and mobile numbers, people and company search with technographics, job-change tracking, a GraphQL API and an MCP connector on shared universal credits.
★ 4.2 · 1,269 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Hunter.io · #9 of 29 LeadIQ · #17 of 29
Match rate75.0%78.3%
Valid email rate62.2%61.7%
Latency p502,252ms682ms
Cost / valid email$0.024$0.074
Invalid rate13.3%2.1%
Catch-all share24.4%34.0%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%95.7%
Decoy hit rate10.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection100.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality+100.0 pts+63.0 pts
Geographic coverage108
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Hunter.io · not in suite LeadIQ · #7 of 24
Match rate-83.7%
Valid / reachable rate-82.9%
Latency p50-680ms
Cost / mobile number-$0.600
Right-person rate-78.3%
Mobile coverage-63.3%
Disconnected rate-0.0%
Low-activity share-17.1%
Landline / mobile classification-92.5%
Country accuracy-80.5%
Geographic coverage-8
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Hunter.io · #15 of 24 LeadIQ · not measured
Profile match rate44.9%-
Identity accuracy100.0%-
Latency p501,223ms-
Price / matched profile$0.0030-
Current employer accuracy90.9%-
Move detection25.0%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy81.8%-
Seniority label accuracy--
Location accuracy100.0%-
Work history completeness--
Education completeness0.0%-
Skills present0.0%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority14.3%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Hunter.io · #5 of 23 LeadIQ · #17 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate100.0%95.3%
Company name accuracy96.0%98.4%
Latency p501,043ms306ms
Price / matched company$0.0030$0.136
Industry accuracy38.0%75.4%
Employee count ±20%25.7%23.4%
HQ / location accuracy83.0%77.0%
Description present97.0%100.0%
Founding year accuracy52.0%62.3%
Domains / social profiles0.0%98.4%
Coverage by country / size100.0%84.6%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Hunter.io · #3 of 10 LeadIQ · #6 of 10
Coverage95.0%93.8%
Detection accuracy66.3%51.3%
Latency p501,043ms306ms
Cost / lookup$0.0032$0.139
Live stack recall25.4%76.5%
Technologies per domain1387
Dated results0.0%0.0%
Coverage by geo / size90.0%84.6%

Questions about Hunter.io vs LeadIQ

Which is better, Hunter.io or LeadIQ?

Hunter.io wins 16 of the 29 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Hunter.io #9 of 29, LeadIQ #17 of 29; Company Data: Hunter.io #5 of 23, LeadIQ #17 of 23; Technographic Data: Hunter.io #3 of 10, LeadIQ #6 of 10.

Which is cheaper, Hunter.io or LeadIQ?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Hunter.io $0.024, LeadIQ $0.074; Company Data, price per matched company: Hunter.io $0.0030, LeadIQ $0.136; Technographic Data, cost per lookup: Hunter.io $0.0032, LeadIQ $0.139.

How do Hunter.io and LeadIQ compare in user reviews?

Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt; LeadIQ holds 4.2 / 5 across 1,269 reviews on G2, Capterra, Chrome Web Store and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Hunter.io and LeadIQ?

Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations; LeadIQ offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and native integrations.

Compare Hunter.io with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.