Head-to-head · B2B data

GetLeads vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 10 of 16 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

GetLeads
6
B2B contact database of 478M+ verified contacts and enrichment built for AI agents: REST API and MCP, no dashboard.
★ 5.0 · 5 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Hunter.io
10
Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.
★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #22 of 29 Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate46.7%75.0%
Valid email rate67.9%62.2%
Latency p503,441ms2,252ms
Cost / valid email$0.157$0.024
Invalid rate0.0%13.3%
Catch-all share32.1%24.4%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%100.0%
Decoy hit rate0.0%10.0%
Catch-all detection0.0%100.0%
Confidence-score quality-+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage610
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #21 of 24 Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate36.7%-
Valid / reachable rate72.2%-
Latency p503,420ms-
Cost / mobile number$0.187-
Right-person rate80.0%-
Mobile coverage26.5%-
Disconnected rate0.0%-
Low-activity share27.8%-
Landline / mobile classification100.0%-
Country accuracy100.0%-
Geographic coverage4-
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · #22 of 24 Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate66.7%44.9%
Identity accuracy100.0%100.0%
Latency p503,454ms1,223ms
Price / matched profile$0.074$0.0030
Current employer accuracy97.5%90.9%
Move detection-25.0%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy60.0%81.8%
Seniority label accuracy62.5%-
Location accuracy92.5%100.0%
Work history completeness--
Education completeness0.0%0.0%
Skills present0.0%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority50.0%14.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · not measured Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate-100.0%
Company name accuracy-96.0%
Latency p50-1,043ms
Price / matched company-$0.0030
Industry accuracy-38.0%
Employee count ±20%-25.7%
HQ / location accuracy-83.0%
Description present-97.0%
Founding year accuracy-52.0%
Domains / social profiles-0.0%
Coverage by country / size-100.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric GetLeads · not measured Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage-95.0%
Detection accuracy-66.3%
Latency p50-1,043ms
Cost / lookup-$0.0032
Live stack recall-25.4%
Technologies per domain-13
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-90.0%

Questions about GetLeads vs Hunter.io

Which is better, GetLeads or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 10 of the 16 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: GetLeads #22 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29; People Data: GetLeads #22 of 24, Hunter.io #15 of 24.

Which is cheaper, GetLeads or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: GetLeads $0.157, Hunter.io $0.024; People Data, price per matched profile: GetLeads $0.074, Hunter.io $0.0030.

How do GetLeads and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

GetLeads holds 5.0 / 5 across 5 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of GetLeads and Hunter.io?

GetLeads offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export and webhooks.

Compare GetLeads with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.