Head-to-head · B2B data

FullEnrich vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 6 of 9 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

FullEnrich

Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 25+ sources for email and mobile, with reverse email lookup.

★ 4.8 · 263 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Hunter.io

Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #4 of 29	Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate	96.2%	75.0%
Valid email rate	66.0%	62.2%
Latency p50	40,638ms	2,252ms
Cost / valid email	$0.077	$0.024
Invalid rate	0.0%	13.3%
Catch-all share	32.0%	24.4%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	+94.4 pts	+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage	8	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #1 of 24	Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate	83.7%	-
Valid / reachable rate	97.6%	-
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.523	-
Right-person rate	100.0%	-
Mobile coverage	81.6%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	2.4%	-
Landline / mobile classification	-	-
Country accuracy	92.7%	-
Geographic coverage	9	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate	-	44.9%
Identity accuracy	-	100.0%
Latency p50	-	1,223ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.0030
Current employer accuracy	-	90.9%
Move detection	-	25.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	-	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	100.0%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	14.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	100.0%
Company name accuracy	-	96.0%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.0030
Industry accuracy	-	38.0%
Employee count ±20%	-	25.7%
HQ / location accuracy	-	83.0%
Description present	-	97.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	52.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	0.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	100.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not in suite	Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage	-	95.0%
Detection accuracy	-	66.3%
Latency p50	-	1,043ms
Cost / lookup	-	$0.0032
Live stack recall	-	25.4%
Technologies per domain	-	13
Dated results	-	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	-	90.0%

Questions about FullEnrich vs Hunter.io

Which is better, FullEnrich or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 6 of the 9 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: FullEnrich #4 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29.

Which is cheaper, FullEnrich or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: FullEnrich $0.077, Hunter.io $0.024.

How do FullEnrich and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

FullEnrich holds 4.8 / 5 across 263 reviews on G2 and Product Hunt; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of FullEnrich and Hunter.io?

FullEnrich offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations.