Head-to-head · B2B data

Findymail vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io wins 19 of 28 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Findymail

Work-email finder and verifier focused on deliverability, with United States phone finding; commonly paired with LinkedIn / Sales Navigator workflows.

★ 4.9 · 64 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Hunter.io

Email finding, verification and domain search, extended to leads and companies; bulk CSV and official MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,382 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Findymail · #2 of 29	Hunter.io · #9 of 29
Match rate	86.7%	75.0%
Valid email rate	67.3%	62.2%
Latency p50	1,727ms	2,252ms
Cost / valid email	$0.020	$0.024
Invalid rate	1.9%	13.3%
Catch-all share	28.8%	24.4%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	98.1%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	10.0%
Catch-all detection	-	100.0%
Confidence-score quality	-	+100.0 pts
Geographic coverage	9	10

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Findymail · #8 of 24	Hunter.io · not in suite
Match rate	51.0%	-
Valid / reachable rate	100.0%	-
Latency p50	1,910ms	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.145	-
Right-person rate	95.5%	-
Mobile coverage	46.9%	-
Disconnected rate	0.0%	-
Low-activity share	0.0%	-
Landline / mobile classification	100.0%	-
Country accuracy	84.0%	-
Geographic coverage	6	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Findymail · not measured	Hunter.io · #15 of 24
Profile match rate	-	44.9%
Identity accuracy	-	100.0%
Latency p50	-	1,223ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.0030
Current employer accuracy	-	90.9%
Move detection	-	25.0%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	-	81.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	100.0%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	14.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Findymail · #18 of 23	Hunter.io · #5 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	98.0%	100.0%
Company name accuracy	92.9%	96.0%
Latency p50	1,168ms	1,043ms
Price / matched company	$0.013	$0.0030
Industry accuracy	73.5%	38.0%
Employee count ±20%	0.0%	25.7%
HQ / location accuracy	80.6%	83.0%
Description present	92.9%	97.0%
Founding year accuracy	0.0%	52.0%
Domains / social profiles	98.0%	0.0%
Coverage by country / size	90.0%	100.0%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Findymail · #9 of 10	Hunter.io · #3 of 10
Coverage	39.0%	95.0%
Detection accuracy	40.5%	66.3%
Latency p50	807ms	1,043ms
Cost / lookup	$0.034	$0.0032
Live stack recall	6.6%	25.4%
Technologies per domain	8	13
Dated results	100.0%	0.0%
Coverage by geo / size	0.0%	90.0%

Questions about Findymail vs Hunter.io

Which is better, Findymail or Hunter.io?

Hunter.io wins 19 of the 28 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Findymail #2 of 29, Hunter.io #9 of 29; Company Data: Findymail #18 of 23, Hunter.io #5 of 23; Technographic Data: Findymail #9 of 10, Hunter.io #3 of 10.

Which is cheaper, Findymail or Hunter.io?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Findymail $0.020, Hunter.io $0.024; Company Data, price per matched company: Findymail $0.013, Hunter.io $0.0030; Technographic Data, cost per lookup: Findymail $0.034, Hunter.io $0.0032.

How do Findymail and Hunter.io compare in user reviews?

Findymail holds 4.9 / 5 across 64 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Hunter.io holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,382 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Findymail and Hunter.io?

Findymail offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations; Hunter.io offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, webhooks and native integrations.