Head-to-head · B2B data

Crustdata vs LeadMagic

Crustdata wins 13 of 19 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Crustdata live
13
Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.
★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
LeadMagic
6
API-first B2B enrichment for GTM engineers and agents: REST, CLI, MCP and CSV across people, company, jobs, intent and technographics.
★ 4.3 · 19 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured LeadMagic · #12 of 29
Match rate-60.0%
Valid email rate-66.7%
Latency p50-6,502ms
Cost / valid email-$0.015
Invalid rate-0.0%
Catch-all share-33.3%
Business email-100.0%
Right-person rate-97.2%
Decoy hit rate-20.0%
Catch-all detection-0.0%
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage-9
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured LeadMagic · #16 of 24
Match rate-57.1%
Valid / reachable rate-85.7%
Latency p50-1,803ms
Cost / mobile number-$0.064
Right-person rate-80.0%
Mobile coverage-44.9%
Disconnected rate-0.0%
Low-activity share-14.3%
Landline / mobile classification-89.3%
Country accuracy-85.7%
Geographic coverage-5
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · #9 of 24 LeadMagic · #21 of 24
Profile match rate95.9%83.7%
Identity accuracy97.9%100.0%
Latency p501,046ms1,947ms
Price / matched profile-$0.010
Current employer accuracy91.5%92.7%
Move detection85.0%13.5%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy87.2%48.8%
Seniority label accuracy80.4%-
Location accuracy87.2%95.1%
Work history completeness7.50.1
Education completeness100.0%0.0%
Skills present0.0%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority83.3%66.7%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · not measured LeadMagic · #22 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate-92.0%
Company name accuracy-94.6%
Latency p50-1,273ms
Price / matched company-$0.010
Industry accuracy-77.2%
Employee count ±20%-16.2%
HQ / location accuracy-63.0%
Description present-98.9%
Founding year accuracy-58.7%
Domains / social profiles-98.9%
Coverage by country / size-75.0%
Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Crustdata · #6 of 6 LeadMagic · #4 of 6
Employer coverage83.3%85.0%
Postings recall47.6%76.7%
Latency p502,858ms9,729ms
Cost / job-$0.028
Closed or unknown postings35.4%47.3%
Duplicate postings13.8%16.7%
Location accuracy96.6%97.3%
Posted-date accuracy66.8%66.3%
Description present100.0%0.0%
Coverage by country81.3%78.6%

Questions about Crustdata vs LeadMagic

Which is better, Crustdata or LeadMagic?

Crustdata wins 13 of the 19 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Crustdata #9 of 24, LeadMagic #21 of 24; Jobs Data: Crustdata #6 of 6, LeadMagic #4 of 6.

How do Crustdata and LeadMagic compare in user reviews?

Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt; LeadMagic holds 4.3 / 5 across 19 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Crustdata and LeadMagic?

Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; LeadMagic offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.

Compare Crustdata with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.