Head-to-head · B2B data

FullEnrich vs LeadMagic

FullEnrich wins 11 of 16 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

FullEnrich

Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 25+ sources for email and mobile, with reverse email lookup.

★ 4.8 · 263 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

LeadMagic

API-first B2B enrichment for GTM engineers and agents: REST, CLI, MCP and CSV across people, company, jobs, intent and technographics.

★ 4.3 · 19 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #4 of 29	LeadMagic · #12 of 29
Match rate	96.2%	60.0%
Valid email rate	66.0%	66.7%
Latency p50	40,638ms	6,502ms
Cost / valid email	$0.077	$0.015
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	32.0%	33.3%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	97.2%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	20.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	+94.4 pts	-
Geographic coverage	8	9

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #1 of 24	LeadMagic · #16 of 24
Match rate	83.7%	57.1%
Valid / reachable rate	97.6%	85.7%
Latency p50	-	1,803ms
Cost / mobile number	$0.523	$0.064
Right-person rate	100.0%	80.0%
Mobile coverage	81.6%	44.9%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	2.4%	14.3%
Landline / mobile classification	-	89.3%
Country accuracy	92.7%	85.7%
Geographic coverage	9	5

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	LeadMagic · #21 of 24
Profile match rate	-	83.7%
Identity accuracy	-	100.0%
Latency p50	-	1,947ms
Price / matched profile	-	$0.010
Current employer accuracy	-	92.7%
Move detection	-	13.5%
Decoy hit rate	-	0.0%
Job title accuracy	-	48.8%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	95.1%
Work history completeness	-	0.1
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	66.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	LeadMagic · #22 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	92.0%
Company name accuracy	-	94.6%
Latency p50	-	1,273ms
Price / matched company	-	$0.010
Industry accuracy	-	77.2%
Employee count ±20%	-	16.2%
HQ / location accuracy	-	63.0%
Description present	-	98.9%
Founding year accuracy	-	58.7%
Domains / social profiles	-	98.9%
Coverage by country / size	-	75.0%

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not in suite	LeadMagic · #4 of 6
Employer coverage	-	85.0%
Postings recall	-	76.7%
Latency p50	-	9,729ms
Cost / job	-	$0.028
Closed or unknown postings	-	47.3%
Duplicate postings	-	16.7%
Location accuracy	-	97.3%
Posted-date accuracy	-	66.3%
Description present	-	0.0%
Coverage by country	-	78.6%

Questions about FullEnrich vs LeadMagic

Which is better, FullEnrich or LeadMagic?

FullEnrich wins 11 of the 16 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: FullEnrich #4 of 29, LeadMagic #12 of 29; Phone Data: FullEnrich #1 of 24, LeadMagic #16 of 24.

Which is cheaper, FullEnrich or LeadMagic?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: FullEnrich $0.077, LeadMagic $0.015; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: FullEnrich $0.523, LeadMagic $0.064.

How do FullEnrich and LeadMagic compare in user reviews?

FullEnrich holds 4.8 / 5 across 263 reviews on G2 and Product Hunt; LeadMagic holds 4.3 / 5 across 19 reviews on G2. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of FullEnrich and LeadMagic?

FullEnrich offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; LeadMagic offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.