Head-to-head · B2B data

Apollo.io vs Crustdata

Apollo.io wins 12 of 22 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Apollo.io

All-in-one GTM platform: B2B database, prospecting, enrichment, job-posting filters, sequences, dialer and sales automation.

★ 4.7 · 10,265 reviewsA

Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Crustdata live

Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.

★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB

Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Apollo.io · #3 of 29	Crustdata · not measured
Match rate	90.0%	-
Valid email rate	64.8%	-
Latency p50	1,302ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.043	-
Invalid rate	1.9%	-
Catch-all share	31.5%	-
Business email	100.0%	-
Right-person rate	94.4%	-
Decoy hit rate	0.0%	-
Catch-all detection	100.0%	-
Confidence-score quality	-	-
Geographic coverage	9	-

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Apollo.io · #4 of 24	Crustdata · #9 of 24
Profile match rate	100.0%	95.9%
Identity accuracy	100.0%	97.9%
Latency p50	1,303ms	1,046ms
Price / matched profile	$0.025	-
Current employer accuracy	95.0%	91.5%
Move detection	88.5%	85.0%
Decoy hit rate	100.0%	0.0%
Job title accuracy	71.7%	87.2%
Seniority label accuracy	85.7%	80.4%
Location accuracy	88.3%	87.2%
Work history completeness	6.7	7.5
Education completeness	0.0%	100.0%
Skills present	0.0%	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	81.7%	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	100.0%	83.3%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Apollo.io · #1 of 23	Crustdata · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate	100.0%	-
Company name accuracy	98.0%	-
Latency p50	906ms	-
Price / matched company	$0.025	-
Industry accuracy	76.0%	-
Employee count ±20%	73.0%	-
HQ / location accuracy	86.0%	-
Description present	100.0%	-
Founding year accuracy	76.0%	-
Domains / social profiles	97.0%	-
Coverage by country / size	100.0%	-

Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Apollo.io · #2 of 6	Crustdata · #6 of 6
Employer coverage	96.7%	83.3%
Postings recall	78.0%	47.6%
Latency p50	3,896ms	2,858ms
Cost / job	$0.0023	-
Closed or unknown postings	29.9%	35.4%
Duplicate postings	15.0%	13.8%
Location accuracy	96.3%	96.6%
Posted-date accuracy	67.8%	66.8%
Description present	0.0%	100.0%
Coverage by country	92.9%	81.3%

Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	Apollo.io · #1 of 10	Crustdata · not measured
Coverage	100.0%	-
Detection accuracy	55.8%	-
Latency p50	906ms	-
Cost / lookup	$0.025	-
Live stack recall	61.8%	-
Technologies per domain	73	-
Dated results	0.0%	-
Coverage by geo / size	100.0%	-

Questions about Apollo.io vs Crustdata

Which is better, Apollo.io or Crustdata?

Apollo.io wins 12 of the 22 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Apollo.io #4 of 24, Crustdata #9 of 24; Jobs Data: Apollo.io #2 of 6, Crustdata #6 of 6.

How do Apollo.io and Crustdata compare in user reviews?

Apollo.io holds 4.7 / 5 across 10,265 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt; Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Apollo.io and Crustdata?

Apollo.io offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.