Head-to-head · B2B data

Icypeas vs Prospeo

Icypeas wins 18 of 31 decided metrics across 3 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Icypeas
18
Contact data and enrichment API: email discovery, verification, reverse lookup, find-people and bulk.
★ 5.0 · 1 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Prospeo
13
Contact data, email verification and enrichment for outbound via API, bulk endpoints and MCP.
★ 4.7 · 1,000 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Icypeas · #7 of 29 Prospeo · #23 of 29
Match rate68.3%61.7%
Valid email rate68.3%54.1%
Latency p506,284ms1,231ms
Cost / valid email$0.013$0.037
Invalid rate0.0%2.7%
Catch-all share31.7%40.5%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%100.0%
Decoy hit rate10.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection46.2%60.0%
Confidence-score quality+53.8 pts-
Geographic coverage105
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Icypeas · not in suite Prospeo · #11 of 24
Match rate-71.4%
Valid / reachable rate-85.7%
Latency p50-570ms
Cost / mobile number-$0.231
Right-person rate-88.0%
Mobile coverage-61.2%
Disconnected rate-2.9%
Low-activity share-11.4%
Landline / mobile classification-97.1%
Country accuracy-88.6%
Geographic coverage-8
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Icypeas · #12 of 24 Prospeo · #3 of 24
Profile match rate83.7%98.0%
Identity accuracy100.0%100.0%
Latency p501,511ms1,278ms
Price / matched profile$0.013$0.020
Current employer accuracy90.2%81.3%
Move detection75.0%7.7%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy87.8%56.3%
Seniority label accuracy-65.1%
Location accuracy78.0%95.8%
Work history completeness7.56.3
Education completeness100.0%0.0%
Skills present24.4%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority58.3%83.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Icypeas · #16 of 23 Prospeo · #9 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate97.0%100.0%
Company name accuracy94.8%94.0%
Latency p501,893ms1,050ms
Price / matched company$0.013$0.020
Industry accuracy77.3%78.0%
Employee count ±20%21.9%25.7%
HQ / location accuracy81.4%81.0%
Description present96.9%94.0%
Founding year accuracy59.8%58.0%
Domains / social profiles97.9%100.0%
Coverage by country / size94.3%100.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Icypeas · not in suite Prospeo · #4 of 10
Coverage-94.0%
Detection accuracy-79.5%
Latency p50-1,050ms
Cost / lookup-$0.021
Live stack recall-59.9%
Technologies per domain-26
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-90.0%

Questions about Icypeas vs Prospeo

Which is better, Icypeas or Prospeo?

Icypeas wins 18 of the 31 metrics decided between them, across 3 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Icypeas #7 of 29, Prospeo #23 of 29; People Data: Icypeas #12 of 24, Prospeo #3 of 24; Company Data: Icypeas #16 of 23, Prospeo #9 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Icypeas or Prospeo?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: Icypeas $0.013, Prospeo $0.037; People Data, price per matched profile: Icypeas $0.013, Prospeo $0.020; Company Data, price per matched company: Icypeas $0.013, Prospeo $0.020.

How do Icypeas and Prospeo compare in user reviews?

Icypeas holds 5.0 / 5 across 1 reviews on G2; Prospeo holds 4.7 / 5 across 1,000 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Icypeas and Prospeo?

Icypeas offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Prospeo offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations.

Compare Icypeas with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.