Head-to-head · B2B data

FullEnrich vs Wiza

FullEnrich wins 11 of 15 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

FullEnrich

Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 25+ sources for email and mobile, with reverse email lookup.

★ 4.8 · 263 reviewsA

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Wiza

LinkedIn-centric contact enrichment from a profile URL, with work-email verification; API, webhooks and MCP.

★ 4.5 · 1,290 reviewsB

Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations

Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #4 of 29	Wiza · #8 of 29
Match rate	96.2%	81.6%
Valid email rate	66.0%	65.0%
Latency p50	40,638ms	-
Cost / valid email	$0.077	$0.077
Invalid rate	0.0%	0.0%
Catch-all share	32.0%	32.5%
Business email	100.0%	100.0%
Right-person rate	100.0%	100.0%
Decoy hit rate	20.0%	0.0%
Catch-all detection	100.0%	0.0%
Confidence-score quality	+94.4 pts	-
Geographic coverage	8	9

Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · #1 of 24	Wiza · #10 of 24
Match rate	83.7%	77.6%
Valid / reachable rate	97.6%	81.6%
Latency p50	-	-
Cost / mobile number	$0.523	$0.158
Right-person rate	100.0%	84.0%
Mobile coverage	81.6%	61.2%
Disconnected rate	0.0%	0.0%
Low-activity share	2.4%	18.4%
Landline / mobile classification	-	97.4%
Country accuracy	92.7%	86.8%
Geographic coverage	9	7

People Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Wiza · #7 of 24
Profile match rate	-	98.0%
Identity accuracy	-	97.9%
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched profile	-	$0.025
Current employer accuracy	-	95.8%
Move detection	-	-
Decoy hit rate	-	-
Job title accuracy	-	89.6%
Seniority label accuracy	-	-
Location accuracy	-	58.3%
Work history completeness	-	-
Education completeness	-	0.0%
Skills present	-	0.0%
Social / profile URLs	-	100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority	-	85.7%

Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics

updated 2026-09-25

Metric	FullEnrich · not measured	Wiza · #2 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate	-	100.0%
Company name accuracy	-	96.0%
Latency p50	-	-
Price / matched company	-	-
Industry accuracy	-	81.0%
Employee count ±20%	-	16.2%
HQ / location accuracy	-	80.0%
Description present	-	70.0%
Founding year accuracy	-	72.0%
Domains / social profiles	-	100.0%
Coverage by country / size	-	100.0%

Questions about FullEnrich vs Wiza

Which is better, FullEnrich or Wiza?

FullEnrich wins 11 of the 15 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: FullEnrich #4 of 29, Wiza #8 of 29; Phone Data: FullEnrich #1 of 24, Wiza #10 of 24.

Which is cheaper, FullEnrich or Wiza?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: FullEnrich $0.077, Wiza $0.077; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: FullEnrich $0.523, Wiza $0.158.

How do FullEnrich and Wiza compare in user reviews?

FullEnrich holds 4.8 / 5 across 263 reviews on G2 and Product Hunt; Wiza holds 4.5 / 5 across 1,290 reviews on G2, Capterra and Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of FullEnrich and Wiza?

FullEnrich offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Wiza offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.