Head-to-head · B2B data

FullEnrich vs GetLeads

FullEnrich wins 11 of 16 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

FullEnrich
11
Waterfall contact enrichment aggregating 25+ sources for email and mobile, with reverse email lookup.
★ 4.8 · 263 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
GetLeads
5
B2B contact database of 478M+ verified contacts and enrichment built for AI agents: REST API and MCP, no dashboard.
★ 5.0 · 5 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric FullEnrich · #4 of 29 GetLeads · #22 of 29
Match rate96.2%46.7%
Valid email rate66.0%67.9%
Latency p5040,638ms3,441ms
Cost / valid email$0.077$0.157
Invalid rate0.0%0.0%
Catch-all share32.0%32.1%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate100.0%100.0%
Decoy hit rate20.0%0.0%
Catch-all detection100.0%0.0%
Confidence-score quality+94.4 pts-
Geographic coverage86
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric FullEnrich · #1 of 24 GetLeads · #21 of 24
Match rate83.7%36.7%
Valid / reachable rate97.6%72.2%
Latency p50-3,420ms
Cost / mobile number$0.523$0.187
Right-person rate100.0%80.0%
Mobile coverage81.6%26.5%
Disconnected rate0.0%0.0%
Low-activity share2.4%27.8%
Landline / mobile classification-100.0%
Country accuracy92.7%100.0%
Geographic coverage94
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric FullEnrich · not measured GetLeads · #22 of 24
Profile match rate-66.7%
Identity accuracy-100.0%
Latency p50-3,454ms
Price / matched profile-$0.074
Current employer accuracy-97.5%
Move detection--
Decoy hit rate-0.0%
Job title accuracy-60.0%
Seniority label accuracy-62.5%
Location accuracy-92.5%
Work history completeness--
Education completeness-0.0%
Skills present-0.0%
Social / profile URLs-100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority-50.0%

Questions about FullEnrich vs GetLeads

Which is better, FullEnrich or GetLeads?

FullEnrich wins 11 of the 16 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: FullEnrich #4 of 29, GetLeads #22 of 29; Phone Data: FullEnrich #1 of 24, GetLeads #21 of 24.

Which is cheaper, FullEnrich or GetLeads?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: Email Data, cost per valid email: FullEnrich $0.077, GetLeads $0.157; Phone Data, cost per mobile number: FullEnrich $0.523, GetLeads $0.187.

How do FullEnrich and GetLeads compare in user reviews?

FullEnrich holds 4.8 / 5 across 263 reviews on G2 and Product Hunt; GetLeads holds 5.0 / 5 across 5 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of FullEnrich and GetLeads?

FullEnrich offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; GetLeads offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks.

Compare FullEnrich with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.